Group statistics

Members:
199
Discussions:
121
Photos:
13

Latest photos

  • Uploaded by
    David A. Goldfarb
  • Uploaded by
    David A. Goldfarb
  • Uploaded by
    2F/2F
  • Uploaded by
    2F/2F
  • Uploaded by
    2F/2F

ACUG--Analogue Cine User Group

16mm bolex test... what went wrong?

#29
All the old interchangeable lens 8mm Bolex and many others used the “D” screw mount lenses, as Kino noted the 16mm screw mount was for 16mm cameras.
There was also a "D" mount RX specification which will not work with non-reflex Bolex H8 cameras, so if you are buying a Switar lens, make sure it's not RX!

Read up on the Bolex Collector's Website.
 
#31
Yes, the RX and non RX designations caused a lot of confusion- IIRC the flange focal depth was longer in the Rex cameras because of the beam splitter prism for the reflex viewfinder so the two will NOT interchange.
 
#33
You wouldn't believe the gizmos we used build to do things like rack focus on a non-reflex camera! A cardboard ring around the lens with footage marked, a focus lever clamped to the barrel and sometimes a tape measure clipped to the belt of the actor just out of the shot with a PA reading off measurements as the actor moved around. Of course, it took 30 minutes to set up and execute a shot, but you did what you had to do to get the shot.
 
#36
You wouldn't believe the gizmos we used build to do things like rack focus on a non-reflex camera! A cardboard ring around the lens with footage marked, a focus lever clamped to the barrel and sometimes a tape measure clipped to the belt of the actor just out of the shot with a PA reading off measurements as the actor moved around. Of course, it took 30 minutes to set up and execute a shot, but you did what you had to do to get the shot.
Barry Lyndon much?
 
#37
might as well show you my "micro short" from this past semester, using a true 16mm Bolex. I had one true rack focus and I think I did alright.
 
#39
What, no fava beans? :wink:

Good job. Was this a 100 foot exercise? I remember my 100 foot films; wonder what ever happened to them after 15 moves and a divorce?

I didn't do too many films for myself; too expensive. I could barely afford tuition, let alone film Most of my work was for others who had at least a small budget. It's tough trying to shoot motion picture film on s shoestring or no string at all,so congratulations on finishing a film. Also, good luck on clearance; it's never easy.
 
#40
Yes, it was an exercise. However, my professor provided everyone with one roll of 500t.
At least the label allowed me to upload the video
 
#41
You have an H-8 and have run 16-mm. film through it. That should be clear by now. Obvious differences between an H-8 and an H-16 are the round (circular) spool spindles with a spring-loaded dog each with H-8. An H-16 has round spindles with a square bottom section and spool retention balls. Older H-8 have a quarter-inch pocket near each lens ports on the turret rim. Nobody knows today what these recessions are for. Younger models wear H16 or H8 on the name plate. Older H-8 have D-mount threads in the turret (UNF ⅝"-32), flange focal distance is the regular 0.484". The H-8 Reflex models have C-mount threads (UNF 1"-32) but an irregular FFD, namely 15,305 mm. The non-Reflex H-16 have the standard C mount (thread UNF 1"-32, FFD 0.69"). The H-16 Reflex models have C mounts and the FFD of 0.8175" or 20,7645 mm. An H-16 has a thicker front than an H-8. Last, the built-in frame counter goes to 2,000 with an H-8 but to 1,000 with an H-16.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom