I'm still out here and checking in from time to time. I agree with the charging issue, at least to recover the (now high) cost of materials, the effort and the risk of not getting quite the right result. It will always be the true art form. Anyone can take 2000 pictures on a digital camera and Photoshop it for an undemanding customer.
I'm now pretty much geared up for 10x8 portraiture (taken a long time to get here) and will be marketing them as legacy portraits, not just portraits. Let the digital snappers do 'just portraits' and i will offer something that can be handed down from generation to generation (archival print = 400 years??) as a genuine family legacy. As a race we don't make anything that lasts anymore - architecture, consumer products, the list goes on, all of it ephemeral and waiting to be replaced by the next great thing, but if you go to photo exhibitions here in London showing works from the 20s/30s/40s, you're rammed in with thousands of others desperate to see something that lasts and that shows who we are and where we came from. Says to me we must make photographs that last for family descendants and/or future exhibition goers. Rant over!!
Will report in from time to time to let you know how i'm getting on. In the meantime, good luck with all your similar endeavours.