Color management seems to be an issue, and so does printing larger sizes (like A2).
I'm using Linux Mint which is based on Ubuntu - and printing using GIMP to an Epson 3880 printer. So far I've made prints up to 13x19 without any issues, using out of the boxc color management in GIMP. I've had to make some adjustments to files which printed well under Windows and Photoshop, but I've been pleasantly surprised so far, but I'm not doing critical color work.
What printer are you using, what color management issues do you run into, and from what kind of application(s) are you printing?
This is just to help along the problem-solving process; I currently don't run Linux on my 'daily driver' desktop and only use it for small in-home servers. The only 'printing' I've been doing that involves Linux is 3D printing using OctoPrint... I did experiment with printing from GIMP (on Windows) and found that GIMP's printing support is downright abysmal. Forget about custom paper sizes or even something as simple as being able to correctly position a print on the paper in the first place. I didn't even try doing anything more fancy. Maybe things have improved in 3.0; I've not tried yet.
Take a modern printer where the color management is done in the printer software. You can upload a custom profile into the printer and just print from the computer without color management.
I've not been aware of any issues loading 16 bit depth images in GIMP in recent years. What issue are you referring to specifically?Isnt there an issue uploading 16 bits photos to GIMP - or is that issue solved?
am I able to control what color profile the printer is using from Ubuntu?
One thing you'll need to understand is that a screen profile has nothing to do with a printer profile. The screen profile is intended to achieve consistency between screens by offering a somewhat standardized output of the innate color data onto a display. The printer profile is intended to offer the same for the combination of printer, printer driver, paper and ink. Therefore, calibrating the screen and calibrating the printer are distinct and separate actions. They are however both required in getting a consistent match between what you see on screen and what you get on paper. So there's no such thing as using a display profile for your printer. If you were to try that, then yes, for sure you'll end up with massive color problems because you're basically working on the assumption that your printer behaves exactly like your monitor. Evidently, this is not the case.Does this mean that I could use the color profile i made for my screen, used with my photo editor, with my Epson SC-P 800 and get matching colors?
If I was uploading a 16 bit tiff file made in PhotoLine to Gimp, Gimp would automatically convert it to 8 bits. You can convert it back to 16 bits, but whats the point. This is some time back - dont know if this is still an issue.I've not been aware of any issues loading 16 bit depth images in GIMP in recent years. What issue are you referring to specifically?
Yea - I agree.As to having Ubuntu managing printing profiles directly and then hoping that nothing will get lost in translation between the app you use to print from and the actual printer, I'm not sure, but info like this doesn't make me enthusiastic: https://askubuntu.com/questions/668345/printer-color-management-how-do-i-calibrate-my-printer See also here: https://discuss.pixls.us/t/gutenprint-linux-assigning-icc-profile-for-printer-paper-combo/23876/5
One thing you'll need to understand is that a screen profile has nothing to do with a printer profile. The screen profile is intended to achieve consistency between screens by offering a somewhat standardized output of the innate color data onto a display. The printer profile is intended to offer the same for the combination of printer, printer driver, paper and ink. Therefore, calibrating the screen and calibrating the printer are distinct and separate actions. They are however both required in getting a consistent match between what you see on screen and what you get on paper. So there's no such thing as using a display profile for your printer. If you were to try that, then yes, for sure you'll end up with massive color problems because you're basically working on the assumption that your printer behaves exactly like your monitor. Evidently, this is not the case.
If I was uploading a 16 bit tiff file made in PhotoLine to Gimp, Gimp would automatically convert it to 8 bits. You can convert it back to 16 bits, but whats the point. This is some time back - dont know if this is still an issue.
If only the world had a consistent standard to design everything toward - something like C41 film and RA4 paper.....
I think I've read something about that before. However, it's not something I've experienced recently. I routinely make 16 bit TIFF scans and then open them in GIMP. Seems to work OK. I'm using Gimp 3.0 presently. Give it a try; see if the problem is still there.
Hope this helps in any way; I do sympathize with your challenge and I feel this is one of the more challenging problems of the open source approach. In principle, it's really great, but it's so easy to break something and so difficult to try and fix it due to the myriad intricacies involved. I'm afraid the closed-source, captive software community has a massive advantage in this case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?