Like Harman's Phoenix I but maybe it is Phoenix X instead as opposed Phoenix I so IX versions' improvements We can but hopeMaybe they're making a colour film...
I don't think we'll see CMS 20 again.
Maybe they're making a colour film...
Maybe they're making a colour film...
I was really disappointed to read the news about CMS II 20 effectively being discontinued due to the closure of Eastman Park Micrographics. It (or more precisely, Agfa Copex) is such a unique film that I'd hate to see Agfa stop manufacturing it. But, without a large vendor like EPM to facilitate adequate global sales, it'd likely be difficult for Agfa to justify the continued expenditure. (Perhaps we'll see?)
The article specified Adox was looking to possibly start production of a black and white film in the spring. A comparable microfilm to replace CMS II 20 would be great -- absolutely -- but I wonder how difficult it is to produce a film with such high resolution.
At the risk of stirring the speculation pot, I'm reminded of a thread I started a few years ago in which I posed a question to Adox regarding the feasibility of reviving Efke/Maco IR820 (https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...y-chance-for-an-adox-supported-reboot.183034/). Adox kindly responded in Post #17.
Ich finde den Artikel ziemlich flach. Inhaltlich gibt es einen groben Fehler, wenn Polyethylen-Folie geschrieben wird. Es muß natürlich Polyester oder ganz genau Polyethylenterephthalat lauten. Meine Kritik betrifft aber den journalistischen Aspekt. Sonst: Alles Gute!
I’m finding the article rather dull. There is a heavy mistake with polyethylene foil. It should read polyester or PETP. My criticism goes on the journalistic aspect. Else: all the best!
Ich finde den Artikel ziemlich flach. Inhaltlich gibt es einen groben Fehler, wenn Polyethylen-Folie geschrieben wird. Es muß natürlich Polyester oder ganz genau Polyethylenterephthalat lauten. Meine Kritik betrifft aber den journalistischen Aspekt. Sonst: Alles Gute!
I’m finding the article rather dull. There is a heavy mistake with polyethylene foil. It should read polyester or PETP. My criticism goes on the journalistic aspect. Else: all the best!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?