Hey hey hey, that looks pretty damn good! I just ordered some Fomapan 400 to try this in the future.Well folks, this bleach works very well, and solves all of the problems we've seen with other bleaches except emulsion damage with some films. I have run a roll of Fomapan 400 in it today and obtained good results. I decided to write up a Photrio resource for others to benefit from here, including the full, working formula with all amounts including the citric acid.
https://www.photrio.com/forum/resources/b-w-reversal-bleach-—-hydrogen-peroxide-edta-citric-acid.448/
Here's the roll I developed today:
View attachment 265184
I still have not tried the etidronic acid/HEDP that I got from Suvatlar in Germany. I will reserve some time to experiment further with that to see if it works better to handle emulsion damage. In the meantime I think it's worth celebrating some victory over most of the other issues we've seen.
cc @Raghu Kuvempunagar, @Donald Qualls, @YoIaMoNwater, @falotico, and most especially @kentanghk who all helped out here!
Hey hey hey, that looks pretty damn good! I just ordered some Fomapan 400 to try this in the future.
I tried reversal with 1:6 Rodinal today with some film leaders from Rollei Superpan 200 and TMax 400 but got bad results. The first failed attempt was probably due to the fact I didn't wash after each step so the bleach wasn't complete (only around the edges of the film did it bleach while the rest was still pretty dark) and the second trial I used 2x KMnO4 and resulted in the emulsion falling off the film base. Both attempts had 0.2% and 0.4% sodium thiocyanate in the first developer, since I thought this could help to clear the base for TMax400. It's worthy to note that 0.4% sodium thiocyanate did resulted in better bleaching in the first trial.
I'm tempted to give ths H2O2 bleach a try too but also to test if DTT can help to clear the highlights.
I tried to find some data on LPD as a film-developer, but came up short, so then I thought about the D-76 ^^
Thanks for the tips, I will see if I can source these things locally first. There are several examples of photographers being caught in "sting operations", because the customs-office found liquid Tetenal slide developer to be GHB (I kid you not, https://translate.google.com/transl...tkontoret-og-sikta-for-narkosmugling/63300815), while others are questioned if they are planning some kind of terror attack.
The paranoia reached astronomical heights here and has remained so after the 2011 terror-bombings. (The terrorist used an ANFO type home-made bomb, which put a whole slew of chemicals on the banned list or antiterror trigger-list, then there is the ISIS threat and so on and so on).
Good grief, that is ridiculous! E6 chemistry is industry standard stuff. And they said it came from "one of Germany's premier photography suppliers" so I am guessing it was from Fotoimpex or Maco. Just absolutely crazy to seize that as drugs at customs.
In any case the two chemicals you would be ordering from that place in France are nowhere near anything that should be detected as an issue, even by incompetent customs folks with meters. But, definitely look locally!
Sorry to hear you had some mixed results. Getting the right amounts of everything for each film stock seems to require a fair bit of tuning. If you have access to Ilford Multigrade paper developer, I have had very good luck with it as a first developer. For a bunch of films it seems to be aggressive enough at 1+5 to not need any solvent. I am now using 1.5g/L for Fomapan 400 with the new bleach. I don't have any thiocyanate to try. For the second developer I use Ilford Multigrade 1+9 for about 8 minutes.
I was looking around online and I think my issue could also be the 2nd developer. Since Rodinal itself is very high pH and can cause emulsion swelling, this combined with the 2x KMnO4 bleach probably caused the emulsion to fall off the film base. Google tells me that the stock Rodinal has a pH of 14, which is absurdly high; in comparision, Microphen is at pH 8.8. If I have time I'm gonna check what the pH of my 1.3x Microphen vs 1:6 Rodinal are and repeat the experiment again but with normal amount of KMnO4.
Ah, interesting thought. When I use Rodinal for regular purposes I used it 1+50. I wonder what the pH is of that as well. I assume it will be quite a lot lower than 1+6! I did not realize the concentrate was pH 14. If you didn't wash thoroughly and went from a very high alkaline pH to an a low acidic pH I can imagine that would make the emulsion pretty unhappy with the reaction that would occur inside it.
I tried to find some data on LPD as a film-developer, but came up short, so then I thought about the D-76 ^^
On a different note, regarding some earlier info/experiences, I believe I've seen a few people report seeing a gain in film speed when using the peroxide and vinegar formula. Can anyone confirm this and what has the average increase in speed been for those finding that to be true? I'm consistently getting an increase of 2 stops using FP4 and the peroxide-vinegar formula. I have yet to try the version with EDTA and citric acid.
Glad you made it this far!
…The citric acid/EDTA bleach is also a blix but quite a bit weaker. I was seeing more or less box speed on Fomapan 400. You still get some emulsion damage, though quite a bit less. It looks like you are shooting 6x12(?) though so you may not notice
The golden hue is probably from the residual silver stain, which if I recall does not appear with the EDTA formula.That’s interesting about the EDTA version yielding results closer to box speed than the acetic acid/vinegar version. I’m on a road trip currently but just got ahold of a small bottle of EDTA (disodium) from a random lab supply store I passed by so will probably five the updated formula with some of my rolls. I’d rather not give up the extra speed but I’m curious if I can get a result without a golden hue. If I can get that then I guess it just because a question of which is more important to me — probably speed in my case (I actually kind of like the golden hue anyway).
And yes, that test was done on 6x12. I’m using this process mostly with 612 and 6x9. Emulsion damage hasn’t been an issue. I maintain temperatures between 30C-40C, never really going down to 20C until the final wash. I’m not sure if that has been helping to reduce potential damage. I’ve been consolidating my notes and will share in a post on my website when I have that complete. Thanks for your confirmation about the film speed.
The golden hue is probably from the residual silver stain, which if I recall does not appear with the EDTA formula.
Yea, my understanding is that it’s from the silver but I would have expected a good sodium sulfite bath to clear most or all of that away. The sulfite certainly reduces it but doesn’t eliminate it in my experience.
I need to read through this thread again to see if anyone left notes about using EDTA with the vinegar formula (as opposed to with citric acid in the later formula) along with the sulfite clearing bath. In the vinegar version of the formula, the vinegar and peroxide combine to become peracetic acid, which makes sense why it’s a little rougher on the emulsion— peracetic acid being more corrosive than either the dilute peroxide or vinegar/acetic acid alone. But it seems like the paracetic acid may for some reason be what causes the speed gain so maintaining that while getting the clearing action of the EDTA would be ideal if possible. If anyone knows where in this thread or elsewhere this might be answered please let me know. I’m sure it must have been tried while folks were working out what became the EDTA/citric acid version. Regarding the differences between acetic acid vs citric acid in the formulas, does anyone know why acetic acid (contributing to the resulting peracetic acid) might contribute to a speed gain where citric acid does not? I’m not sure what the resulting compound is when the citric acid combines with the peroxide but if I’m not mistaken, acetic acid and citric acid are fairly similar with the primary difference being that citric acid is tribasic where acetic acid is monobasic. I wish PE was still around. My bet would be that he would know exactly how to explain it. (Cheers to the man and the legend)
I need to read through this thread again to see if anyone left notes about using EDTA with the vinegar formula (as opposed to with citric acid in the later formula) along with the sulfite clearing bath.
The golden hue is probably from the residual silver stain, which if I recall does not appear with the EDTA formula.
If the bleach (or an additive in first developer, such as the thiosulfate I've added in the past) dissolves some of the undeveloped halide, this will lighten the final positive -- which is effectively an increase in film speed.
In other words, what is gained in shadows is lost in the highlights.
Can bleach increase the speed of a film in reversal processing? Intriguing!
This depends on the type of film used in reversal. Thicker film emulsions such HP5 seems to handle blown highlights better than thinner ones like Rolleis. Which makes sense since the amount of leftover silver halides after bleach is what is used to become the positives.If the bleach in reversal processing dissolves some of the undeveloped halide in the shadows, i.e. if it acts like a blix, it will do so through out the image and thereby wiping out the critical highlights. In other words, what is gained in shadows is lost in the highlights.
This depends on the type of film used in reversal. Thicker film emulsions such HP5 seems to handle blown highlights better than thinner ones like Rolleis. Which makes sense since the amount of leftover silver halides after bleach is what is used to become the positives.
Agreed. I’m not sure if that’s a reply to me, but you are saying the same thing.A bleach when acting like a blix can definitely lighten the deep shadows by removing the halides. But it can't possibly create detail where there is none. Any shadow detail appearing in the final slide must also be present in the film right after the first development. All subsequent steps in reversal processing can subtract detail (if adequate care isn't taken) and can't possibly create detail that the first development didn't produce. So one can easily verify the presence of shadow details by fixing the film after first development and checking the shadow areas with a loupe or using densitometer. If there's any speed increase, it'll be visible in the negatives.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?