Clean, lubricate, adjust: A promise that costs a lot if kept

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,319
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
CLA, as a term, probably comes from Hasselblad basic service - which involves taking the camera apart. There is nothing you can do without taking the camera apart. It could also come from basic large format shutter service, which involves taking the shutter apart, It could come from basic Leica thread-mount service - which requires the camera be taken apart. That is, if it's meaningful at all, it should be cleaning the old lubricant and internal gunk, lubricating where required, adjusting the mechanism to establish spec. Frankly, it doesn't apply too easily to a camera like a Contax 139, which is not made in a way to be pleasantly serviced. Replace this, replace that, reassemble - once parts dry up, throw the thing away.

So people can use the term to mean SFA or they can use it in a more meaningful way. The majority of people seem willing to think it means SFA. Maybe people aren't familiar with SFA??
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,332
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
If I had a Contax 139, I'd just send it to Andreas. This CLA/SFA/XYZ looks just like something he could do! Me, I'd sell it on ebay as "untested".

Contax 139 Resource - DIY Repairs

This page is intended to give some guidance to anyone wishing to attempt their own repairs. It doesn’t detail everything possible and probably never will but it should get you started at least. The page does get updated occasionally as I get to record and write up more things. Needless to say,
www.contax139.co.uk

Contax 139 Resource - Documents

All the following are free to copy or download. Just click on the links. Please don't abuse this by downloading documents then selling them on eBay (you know who you are...) 139 documents Contax 139 User Manual Contax 139 Service Manual Contax 139 Assembly Manual (and parts lists) Contax 139
www.contax139.co.uk
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,873
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
A long time ago - at least four or more decades or so - people who used film cameras heavily and/or in challenging conditions - for example, Arctic conditions - used to have regular preventative maintenance performed.
And those cameras were made with the expectation that they would be maintainable.
And then the world changed.
 

Nitroplait

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Messages
774
Location
Europe (EU)
Format
Multi Format

...and you will be able to find someone who will say something very similar about DAG or any one of the others from the repair tech A-list for that matter.

They are not God's nor saints and on top of that; many of them are poor communicators.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format

The "other for $250" will be an unknown quantity and unless it's known and documented that's been serviced recently there's a real change it may need that same $300 service soon. If I already have a camera I like, and $300 will fix it up nicely, I'd always choose to do that over buying another one for $250 that I have no idea about.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
2,916
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format

Some were specially built for those undertakings..... like the Nikon F2 Titan made for Japanese adventurer Naomi Uemura. But others used stock cameras like the Olympus OM1 on himalayan expeditions by Sir Christian Bonington , or my friend Pat Morrow's Pentax MX to the summit of Everest and many other expeditions.
 
Last edited:

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,482
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format

I think they clean then lubed what they can reach without a complete disassembly. Cleaning also means cleaning the mirror box and prisms, and focusing screen. I would need to price out a complete tear down, it will be more than $125.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
2,916
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
Nitroplait said:
...and you will be able to find someone who will say something very similar about DAG or any one of the others from the repair tech A-list for that matter.

They are not God's nor saints and on top of that; many of them are poor communicators.
Click to expand...

That is not at all true of Don Goldberg, so you've made an example and impugned someone's reputation.....
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,319
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Paul Howell said:
I would need to price out a complete tear down, it will be more than $125.
Click to expand...

If the camera is not taken apart, and the old lubrication is not cleaned out of it, the service is superficial and basically useless. Anyone can clean the mirror. Anyone can take a syringe and spray the oil into the AE1 to get rid of its wheeze. Those things do nothing meaningful.

I'm not denying that people generally get nothing for a CLA. And I'm not saying it's a real service (or ever was). But it should be a bit of insurance that an already-working camera will continue to work perhaps a bit better. Or people shouldn't get it done.
 

qqphot

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
179
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Format
35mm RF
GregY said:
That is not at all true of Don Goldberg, so you've made an example and impugned someone's reputation.....
Click to expand...

Are you saying Don has never done careless work, or that he's never failed to communicate clearly? I find it really frustrating that it's so taboo to mention negative experiences with the big name repairers here. We're lucky to have them, yes, but none of them are infallible.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
2,916
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format

I'm saying if you haven't personally had problems with Don, you're just gossiping.
I've had nothing but faultless communication and work from him.
 
OP
OP

Andreas Thaler

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
4,280
Location
Vienna/Austria
Format
35mm
Nitroplait said:
They are not God's nor saints and on top of that; many of them are poor communicators.
Click to expand...

Good communication is half the success of a business. But not everyone has the talent or disposition for it, or simply doesn't have the time, as it's a one-man show.

When I was a customer of repair shops with their own premises here in Vienna, I admired the ability to communicate and do repair work.

In one case, the owner was alone and had to stop working when the door to his shop opened. Then he switched from working with great concentration on a camera to talking to customers.

Two worlds, switching between them without transition.
 

qqphot

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
179
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Format
35mm RF
GregY said:
I'm saying if you haven't personally had problems with Don, you're just gossiping.
I've had nothing but faultless communication and work from him.
Click to expand...

That's great for you. And if I have, and dare to mention it, I get shit on for "badmouthing" him. This is what's frustrating.
 

Hassasin

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
1,305
Location
Hassasstan
Format
Multi Format
I'll repeat what I had posted elsewhere: My Rolleiflex 3.5 F Planar was 40 when I bought it, looked never (or hardly ever) used and ran perfectly in every aspect But I got cute with it, went with Mr. Fleenor hype, and figured putting Maxwell in was the needed icing on the cake. Some 400-500 $ later camera came back, looked exactly same as before this service, nothing of note regarding functionality, and just did have the new screen. 20 years later, little use, camera needs service to be useable, everything is basically sluggish to stuck. Kill me for not "exercising" it through this time, but I'd bet a lot it would work today as well as it did 20 years ago had I not CLA'd it.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,332
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format

Maybe and maybe not. Those particular shutters can be finicky. About 1985 I bought a Rolleicord Vb from a guy whose father bought it and soon thereafter died. It was unused for a decade or so. The shutter was sluggish and the local Rollei-trained repairman, after marveling at how little it had been used, overhauled the little-used shutter. It worked flawlessly in constant moderate usage for about 29 years. Then the shutter started getting sluggish again. Unfortunately my Rollei repairman is long gone.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,482
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I was looking though a box of negatives and work prints from the mid 1970s and found a recipe from Nikon Los Angles service center, I paid $80 for a clean lube and adjust on my F2 in 1977. Running the number through the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator that is now $415. In the 80s I paid a bit over a hundred U.S to my F2 and later F3 serviced by Nikon London.
 

beemermark

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
848
Format
4x5 Format
Not to defend Sherry but there it’s very probale she didn’t have the part.

DAG has repaired three cameras for me in the last 5 years. An M7 ($200), R7 ($200 open circuit +CLA), and what was a working M4 that I wanted a CLA ($500). DAG will patient explain what he does for that money. The M4 is like the Nikon F series. Cameras were made to be adjusted in total and repaired, and made to last forever. The M7 and R7 with modern components require much less work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…