I have used their 111 glossy surface quite a lot in the past few years. It is excellent paper in every way. As with any fiber paper the chemical bath and wash times are a little longer than RC, but that’s not a concern. Otherwise, all the same printing tips and tricks apply. Go for it.
The main thing you need to be aware of is that it's a true matte paper, so it's dmax is a bit lower than any of the glossy papers you might have used. Other than that, just proces it like any other MG FB paper and you'll get good results.
I have used their 111 glossy surface quite a lot in the past few years. It is excellent paper in every way. As with any fiber paper the chemical bath and wash times are a little longer than RC, but that’s not a concern. Otherwise, all the same printing tips and tricks apply. Go for it.
I wholeheartedly agree, this Bohemia made photo paper is very good, I am printing on it since (the glossy variant) 2006 as a replacement for the gone Agfa multicontrast Classic baryta 111.
In my experience, Foma's emulsions are fairly closely speed-matched between their RC and FB bases. So exposure will be (nearly) identical to RC, but as stated earlier, processing and especially washing will take longer.
Fomabrom 112 is a fine paper, and a nearly dead-matte surface with only a subtle sheen. It's an excellent product in my experience. The only reason why I don't use it much is because I generally prefer the deeper blacks of a non-matte paper. I wouldn't qualify the difference as "a bit" lower dmax on 112 compared to 111 as @Buzz-01 does, but actually "significantly" lower. It's not a defect of the paper though, but an unavoidable consequence of a matte surface!
Few weeks ago I opened a pack of fresh Fomabrom Variant 111 13x18 and noticed a very soft surface finish of the paper when wet. It even got a subtle mesh pattern by a contact with a drying rack.