I needed to rebuy a bunch of lenses for a system I sold off a year or so ago. I started with one this week that cost $99 US dollars, which with exchange is $143. With shipping I paid a total of $204 Canadian. So it was sent to me via DHL Express from Japan. So today I get the customs payment request and its asking me to pay a whopping $167 Canadian before they'll clear it. That is more then the lens actually cost! WTF? How the heck can duty add up to this much, and I dont believe even the tarrifs would cost that much. Does anyone know why my duty is more then the item itself? I sent a heated letter to the seller asking him why and threatened to have it returned to sender for a full refund.
I did but they closed before I could call them today.Have you tried contacting DHL in Canada? They may be able to explain why the duty is so high.
I've had issues before buying from small dealers in Japan (here in USA) I've found it's usually how the seller classified the item. Doubtful you'll get very far with DHL, worth a try. Stinks because Japan dealers have wonderful things.
Same as Andrew when I see DHL or UPS is involved. I mailed a parcel to the USA yesterday and when it got to the Canada Post processing plant I got a notice "Delivery may be delayed due to public authority". I have no idea what this means but probably the recipient is going to have to wait for it to be delivered.DHL not only ships your item, but acts as customs broker...and they charge a fee for this. Whenever DHL or UPS is cited as the shipper, I run.
When it was new maybe, but this is not a new lens. There is no way they'd value this lens at over 1200 today.
My buying policy is frugality first. If something is not already in the US, I don't need it as bad as I thought, so I don't buy it.
Let's see... "Duty" as I understand it, is simply for a duty official to open an package and check for drugs, non-domestic invasive animal or plant species, or dangerous contraband, whereupon the package is re-sealed and re-injected into the shipping process. Unless the bureau that employs these people become bloated with excess personnel, there would be no reason to inflate the cost beyond that. Something is amiss with these figures.
In modern times, when applied fairly, duty rates are used to adjust for all sorts market unfairness.
"Duty" as I understand it, is simply for a duty official to open an package and check for drugs, non-domestic invasive animal or plant species, or dangerous contraband, whereupon the package is re-sealed and re-injected into the shipping process.
It's not so much about any real valuation of the lens as such. DHL won't inspect it to that level of detail. They will use standard item values for broader categories; your lens may have been categorized as a "precision optical item" or "camera equipment" and DHL would have a default value for that. That value won't relate to the actual item's original list price, current resale value etc. in any way. It's just an accounting 'reality'. This sort of problem can occur if the sender fails to declare the value properly, which is necessary in order to prevent the clearance office from having to do the valuation themselves, which will virtually always be to the disadvantage of the buyer.
One more thing to take into account, although it makes only a relatively small difference, is that the taxes may be calculated over the item price plus shipping cost.
That's very nice, but some of us (1) do want a certain piece of kit sometimes and (2) don't all live in a place with a large internal market (from a tax perspective). In those cases, imports are just a fact of life.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?