I'm stumped with this problem....

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,913
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
From what I can see, you were developing a single reel in a tall tank, right? Have you checked to see if the reels is locking to the filler tube well enough that it doesnt ride up to the top of the tank during agitation and stay there a while? Thats the simplest explanation of poor development with good developer. When I used Paterson tanks ages ago I would usually slip a few empty reels on top to anchor the bottom reel to avoid this problem. If you were depending on a plastic clip to do this, it may have developed a crack or got sprung open a bit causing it to lose grip.
 
OP
OP

schrollphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
73
Location
West Central
Format
Multi Format
Thanks to everyone for your input! At the moment, I have ruled out camera malfunction due to the fact that every roll since the disaster roll has been perfectly exposed and spaced. It has to be in my process somewhere. As was suggested, we all make mistakes! I have contacted Ilford and hope to hear from them soon. Right now, I am switching back to D76 where I was in the 1990's. I will do my testing today and see where my EI and developing time is and keep shooting! I will keep everyone posted.
Again, thanks to all who have responded. I have always been a follower of this forum but have never asked for help. I usually learn from everyone else's mistakes, now it was my turn! Thanks.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,844
Format
Hybrid
not enough dektol/ansco130
seriously ditch the boutique developers
and mix either of those 2 1:10 10 mins
you'll get the best negatives ever.
( yes i do this myself im not an armchair advocate )
 

esearing

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
364
Location
North GA
Format
4x5 Format
Pyrocat sudden death and the tell tale pink tone. I have experienced it too many times. Sometimes you can get less dramatic results by shaking/remixing and it seems to come back to life. If it got below 60 degrees in storage, warming it seems to fix the issue temporarily. But I got burned too many times and switched from HD to Pyrocat M (Metol).
Just because you bought it recently doesn't mean the components were mixed recently either. I had one that was 4 years old when I bought it and got barely 6 months out of it after opening. I don't think its an FP4 issues as I have had it happen in middle of a batch of 4x5s from the same box.

I'm tempted to try Jnantz's recipe for Ansco 130. I love it as a paper developer.

One other test you can try and see if your Pyrocat HD is the problem. Bleach a junk negative, and mix 5:5:100 pyrocat and redevelop the negative. If it comes back, your solution is ok. It may take a while but you can do this in room light. You can also do the same with a print but will get a color shift to brown if it works at all.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,156
Format
4x5 Format
Haa, just do pyrocat with inspection and drop it in D-76 if the inspection fails! That way you might never have to use D-76 except in an emergency.

It seems a shame to switch to standard developer when you “really want” edge effects, stain effect and other special qualities of pyro.

You could just bring the D-76 up to temperature and leave it sealed. Don’t open it until you need to.
 
OP
OP

schrollphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
73
Location
West Central
Format
Multi Format
Finally getting back with my findings. I contacted Ilford and sent samples along with a detailed description of my process. Their response was a very detailed answer and explanation of a possible random contamination problem that was possibly the result of my PyroCat HD reaching its end of life. They explained the susceptibility of minute contamination in developer in that state was high. Although I had just opened the set two months before it seemed possible. I had noticed the solution A was cloudy this time and had never been in previous sets over the years of using it, always in glycol. With that information, I contacted Photographer's Formulary (my source) with all of the same samples and explanation. Again, they were very helpful and agreed with Ilford's determination. Without asking, they sent me a new set of PyroCat! I immediately notice that the solution A was clear not cloudy. I have since developed both sheets (in a tray) and 120 rolls (in the same single roll Paterson tank and reel) without a recurrence of the problem. My process remained unchanged and I feel confident in going forward and concentrating on "chasing the light" with my friend for years...FP4+.
 

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,406
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
Forevermore, no exceptions, never deviate, never disqualify, never cease and desist: You must ALWAYS do a tiny clip test with the same working solution you will be using for your important film. Some of you have a real problem getting a scissors and clipping a tiny piece of film and exposing it in your camera and doing what I have directed. Case closed. Period.

I am terrified of these strange developers like XTOL and Pyro:

They die ....
without even saying good-bye.

(MQ gives ample notice.) - David Lyga
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,599
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
A 36 exposure 35mm roll of the same filmstock, shot on a well exposed target and kept in the refrigerator, would give you control targets to test your Pyro before you process that unrepeatable roll.

Cheap insurance...
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,559
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
this happened to me once.In the end, I determined ,I had used the fixer prior to the developer; I was embarrassed but it never happened again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…