Is an infrared thermometer reliable to measure our chemistry temps?

goodimage

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
18
Location
Wisconsin
Format
Medium Format
Just wondering. I use the General Mini Infrared IRT 3. Can this technology be trusted?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The ones I've read about aren't precise enough for things like developer.
They could be useful for other parts of the process, where somewhat less accuracy is required.
And you better be careful - some people are really irritated when people refer to developer as "soup" .
 
OP
OP

goodimage

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
18
Location
Wisconsin
Format
Medium Format
Sorry about the Cambells faux paux. My apology to everyone online tonite. Signed a Neewbie.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
No apology necessary .
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,105
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Calling developer "soup" is like calling a person a "muggle", those are pejorative.
 

Ariston

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
1,658
Location
Atlanta
Format
Multi Format
Haha, I never knew photographers were so sensitive. You shouldn’t let me find out stuff like this. I already use the term “shooting a photo” because I am too obtuse to be bothered with anything resembling political correctness!
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,214
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Most IR thermometers I've used should be adjusted for material emissivity. I know stainless will read different than carbon steel. I wouldn't take the chance. I've heard the term "soup" used for chemistry.
I would think properly calibrated IR would work.
For my work I use a Jobo color thermometer, Kodak Process thermometer, and my nice dial thermometers. The Jobo and Kodak thermometers agree given time to reach equilibrium. I've only had to make minor adjustments over the decades to my favorite dial thermometer. I have some digital aquarium thermometers, I bought from an Ebay vendor from China. They are dead on, GIVEN TIME, in agreement with the Kodak. These little digital things have a sensor on a 1 meter wire and are powered by a button cell, LCD readout, around 3 dollars each. There's a thermocouple buried in the plastic of the sensor. Thermocouples are pretty much a quasi Primary standard.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I reject terms as "soup" and "shooting"...

Thrermometers:
I would not use a IR-one (actually not even got one.) If you want to save money on a new thermometer and are only doing colour (yes, I know this is a B&W thread), you may use an electronic contact medical thermometer. They are cheap, but very precise, however only meter around 100°F and are a clumsy in practise as they only show a maximum value, so have to be reset before each metering.
 

msage

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2003
Messages
436
Location
Washington State
Format
Large Format
Haha, I never knew photographers were so sensitive. You shouldn’t let me find out stuff like this. I already use the term “shooting a photo” because I am too obtuse to be bothered with anything resembling political correctness!
It is not being politically correct, it is using the correct words and names. The one that bothers me is calling fixer, hypo!
 

David Lyga

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
3,401
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
I also despise 'soup' and I also despise the very old way of talking about the solution between developer and fixer: 'short-stop'. Where did that come from? 'Hypo' is not only plain incorrect, but obscene, as well. I also hate 'awesome', 'super', and 'Dave'. - David Lyga
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I'm tolerant of those who use "hypo", as long as they are actually using old fashioned sodium thiosulfate (historically known as sodium hyposulfate) fixer.
If they are using modern rapid (ammonium thiosulfate based) fixers, I'm unhappy.
And if they start using "hypo" to refer to wash-aid (e.g. Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent) - I rarely forgive!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,105
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I still use the term "hypo", but I am not "hyper".
 

Trask

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
1,925
Location
Virginia (northern)
Format
35mm RF
No “soup,” even a bit tungue-in-cheek? I recall Donald Qualls’ Super Soup...a bit of fun is no sin.
 

mrosenlof

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
622
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
"soup"? irritated? really??? some people need to relax a little bit. I don't think it's a term I use, but it wouldn't offend me.

A few years ago, I bought a steel developing tank somewhere used. It has one of the old 60s/70s Dymo labels that says "HIPPO CLEAR". And since then I've never had a hippo in my darkroom.
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,012
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
I have a cheap one and when I point it at a rotating Jobo tank it agrees with the thermometer in the tempering bath.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,303
Format
Multi Format
I have one that I use in my kitchen. I think they're good for surface temperatures like BBQ grills. I don't know about getting the temperature of a whole graduate of developer.
 

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
Sorry about the Cambells faux paux. My apology to everyone online tonite. Signed a Neewbie.
Yes, soup makes mighty "weak" developer and developer makes lousy soup. Fixer is much better. Don't try it. That was a joke. A joke, that is.........Regards.
 
OP
OP

goodimage

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
18
Location
Wisconsin
Format
Medium Format
I have one that I use in my kitchen. I think they're good for surface temperatures like BBQ grills. I don't know about getting the temperature of a whole graduate of developer.
Do you believe that my meter would be accurate if I mixed the solution while taking the temperature with the instrument? That would actually be measuring the solution completely, would it not? Envision this action while aiming the instrument at a tray of solution while rocking it like a normal timed rocking of the tray while developing a print in the tray.
 

mrosenlof

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
622
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
I don't know much about those IR non-contact thermometers. I've used a dial thermometer for years of B/W, and it's been good enough. I don't own a densitometer, so your idea of "good enough" might be different than mine.

I recently bought a patterson mercury thermometer that covers a pretty specific darkroom range. It's supposed to be good enough for color work. In my case it was a local sale, so there were no shipping issues.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
A 1C or 2F degree of imprecision matters with developer.
At 68F/20C, what do the specifications of your thermometer say about its precision?
I quote: "Measurement Accuracy: ±3.6F (2°C) or 2% of reading (whichever is greater above 32°F)"
 
OP
OP

goodimage

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
18
Location
Wisconsin
Format
Medium Format
Hi Matt. That is from my thermometer manual. Think it is not accurate enough?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Hi Matt. That is from my thermometer manual. Think it is not accurate enough?
Correct - not accurate enough.
Or more importantly, of uncertain consistency.
If you are aiming for 20C, and your results will range everywhere between 18C and 22C depending on the circumstances, with no way to tell where on that range your particular measurement is, you will have real difficulty obtaining repeatable results with black and white film, and really poor results with colour film.
For chemicals other than developer, and for getting chemicals close to the target temperature, that thermometer might be quick and helpful, but you will want something more accurate and repeatable to fine tune the results.
 
OP
OP

goodimage

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
18
Location
Wisconsin
Format
Medium Format
Ok. I will continue to test this thermometer. How do you read a mercury thermometer in a darkroom?
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
By switching on the light.

Unless doing some continuous processing I do not see a reason to take a metering during processing.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Ok. I will continue to test this thermometer. How do you read a mercury thermometer in a darkroom?
If your thermometer is indeed a mercury thermometer, it must be fairly old!
The problem with the IR thermometers is how they are used. A thermometer that is partially immersed into a solution is more likely to give you a correct reading for the solution.
I have a Kodak process thermometer that I use as a reference standard.
I use inexpensive digital kitchen or multi-purpose digital thermometers. I check them regularly - at or about my target temperature - against my reference standard.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…