Resource icon

Kodak IN-1 Mercury Intensifier

Overview Discussion

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O
FilmIs4Ever submitted a new resource:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists) - Kodak IN-1 Mercury Intensifier


(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

smieglitz

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
1,950
Location
Climax, Michigan
Format
Large Format
If there is any single chemical that should not be used in photography any longer, mercuric chloride is at the top of the list. It is a deadly poison and should only be used by professionals with proper lab training and in proper lab facilities.

From the JT Baker MSDS for mercuric chloride:

SAF-T-DATA(tm) Ratings (Provided here for your convenience)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Rating: 4 - Extreme (Poison)
Flammability Rating: 0 - None
Reactivity Rating: 2 - Moderate
Contact Rating: 4 - Extreme (Life)
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES & SHIELD; LAB COAT & APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES
Storage Color Code: Blue (Health)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential Health Effects
----------------------------------

Inhalation:
Causes irritation to the respiratory tract. Symptoms include sore throat, coughing, pain, tightness in chest, breathing difficulties, shortness of breath and headache. Pneumonitis may develop. Can be absorbed through inhalation with symptoms to parallel ingestion. Vapor inhalation can burn the mucous membrane of the nose and throat.
Ingestion:
Highly Toxic! Average lethal dose for inorganic mercury salts is about 1 gram. May cause burning of the mouth and pharynx, abdominal pain, vomiting, corrosive ulceration, bloody diarrhea. May be followed by a rapid and weak pulse, shallow breathing, paleness, exhaustion, central nervous system problems, tremors and collapse. Delayed death may occur from renal failure.
Skin Contact:
Causes irritaton and burns to skin. Symptoms include redness and pain. May cause skin allergy and sensitization. Can be absorbed through the skin with symptoms to parallel ingestion.
Eye Contact:
Causes irritation and burns to eyes. Symptoms include redness, pain, blurred vision; may cause serious and permanent eye damage.
Chronic Exposure:
Chronic exposure through any route can produce central nervous system damage. May cause muscle tremors, personality and behavior changes, memory loss, metallic taste, loosening of the teeth, digestive disorders, skin rashes, brain damage and kidney damage. Can cause skin allergies and accumulate in the body. Repeated skin contact can cause the skin to turn gray in color. Teratogen: can damage the developing fetus and decrease fertility in males and females.
Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
Persons with nervous disorders, or impaired kidney or respiratory function, or a history of allergies or a known sensitization to mercury may be more susceptible to the effects of the substance.


There are less toxic intensifier formulas available. Better yet, expose and develop film correctly.
 
OP
OP

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O
Way to overreact.

This is a serious intensifier for serious photographers. It is also one of the best. I listed appropriate precautions, and listed it as an advanced formula.

Compared to using Uranium Toner, or making Daguerrotypes using mercury *vapors* this is child's play by comparison. Just don't drink the mercury. . .
 

smieglitz

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
1,950
Location
Climax, Michigan
Format
Large Format
"Advanced Experience" IMO is not a sufficient warning.

All you've done here is listed an antiquated, dangerous, and largely abandoned formula with no directions or sufficient warning statements.

You may think I'm overreacting, but I think your post is irresponsible and might lead to someone harming themselves. You may know the dangers, but there are a lot of novices around here who won't.

The stuff is also known as "corrosive sublimate" and for good reason. It is harmful by inhalation as well as ingestion and skin contact. And if you are going to recommend a formula that requires use of such a nasty chemical, be responsible and post the proper precautions or links to further information. I'd expect that to be the case with any info posted on Uranium toner or hot mercury developed dags as well.
 

Monophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
1,690
Location
Saratoga Spr
Format
Multi Format
Like so many other things in life, the decision to use mercury intensifier is a personal choice, and individuals who choose to use it are responsible for the consequences to themselves and those around them. Yes, the stuff is dangerous, and yes, it can be used safely, but one has to know and deal with the risks.

Many years ago, I was in a workshop with a well-known photographer who uses mercury intensification extensively. He did a demonstration for us, and the results were amazing.

On the other hand, the man was in his late 60s and had been using it for years. He had a strange cadence in his voice - long pauses that suggested some kind of struggling mental process. I'm not a physician, but if I were, I might be tempted to suspect a correlation.

My choice is to try to expose and develop my negatives so that I don't have to resort to mercury intensification or other forms of negative torture.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,247
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
If you need to use an intensifier like this there's something seriously wrong with your techniques.

These intensifiers have long gone out of use.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,981
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
On the other hand, some of us are using processes that have long gone out of use that require high contrast negs. I can usually get them without using an intensifier, and if I do need an intensifier, selenium toner is usually as much as I need, but it's good to have a record of the other options.
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
I agree with Joe. Mercury compounds should be avoided and not used. Mercury can contamination can easily occur in unexpected ways such as in the event of a fire or natural disaster. IMO this thread should be pulled.
 
OP
OP

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O
donbga said:
I agree with Joe. Mercury compounds should be avoided and not used. Mercury can contamination can easily occur in unexpected ways such as in the event of a fire or natural disaster. IMO this thread should be pulled.
Click to expand...

Who the hell are you? You can buy Mercury Thermometers with almost an ounce of mercury for *one dollar* on eBay.

There is nothing wrong with the use of mercury if you use the proper precautions. You people are so assinine it makes me sick.

If you're afraid of a little bloody nose, maybe you had better run home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous.
 

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan

I'm someone who knows better than to use mecury chloride. Suggesting it's use with the simple warning isn't responsible. Do some research about the compound and it's effects on the human body and you might understand my ire. I've had several Phd chemists/photographers tell me directly to not use this compound.

Since you know so much about mercury, you should know that the pure metallic form is rather harmless. The mercury salt is deadly and easily absorbed or injested by the body.

I'm not trying to come in on my high horse and poo-poo your post just for the hell of it. Very small amounts, less than 3 tenths of a gram, can cause tissue damage in the kidneys and liver.

Mercury chloride is a deadly toxin and shouldn't be used in the darkroom. Period.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,981
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Okay, lets tone this down folks. It is perfectly compatible to have mercury intensifier formulas available on APUG (with adequate warnings) and for individuals to post strong recommendations against their use. Just glancing quickly at my shelf, I can find three mercury intensifier formulas in the Morgan and Morgan _Darkroom Book_ (1980), and this particular formula is included in Steve Anchell's _Darkroom Cookbook_ (2000). Anchell includes the following warning (p. 246):

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…