All kind of things might have changed, including enviro and hazmat rules, related unavailability of certain ingredients, lack of marketability in different countries or states with differing rules, simplification of manufacture (itself related to facilities capacity), who knows? Kodak has been selling off its fingers and toes, then arms and legs, one by one, and apparently finds it more convenient just to license its name or to subcontract. That's been going on quite awhile now. But nobody needs a rude awakening accidentally finding out that a replacement product doesn't store as well as the previous version. This can hypothetically apply to even bottles bought "new" if there's no expiration date attached to the batch number, and they've sat on a shelf a long time prior to purchase. It wouldn't be such an issue if the HC-110 hadn't earned such a sterling reputation for stability. If that key property is lost, it simply ain't the same thing either qualitatively or functionally. That doesn't mean I won't buy the new product when my old stock runs out, but that we'll have to be a lot more religious about the freshness of the concentrate itself. So we'll just have to keep an eye out for what the new reality actually is. But that's an independent question from truly replicating the old formula - a distinction a couple of you can't even seem to comprehend, or why it might be quite important to someone else. Don't worry, nobody is going to ask you to do it ! Mshchem has signed with Elon Musk to do it, as he fiddles with his made in China calculator sitting on a lawn chair made in China, sipping ice tea from a cup made in China.
To assume any reason for these changes other than continuity of business, and an effort to make a profit for the pensioners, is Nuts. Kodak Alaris is trying to unload these businesses ASAP. The color negative paper and Kodak Alaris chemistry business has been sold to in the words of one of our US Senators "Communist China". Could the "secret formula" for HC-110 have fallen into enemy hands?
Time will tell. Elon Musk got the US back into manned spaceflight, we may need a "Manhattan Project" funnel millions of Federal dollars into "The HC-110 and XTOL GAP!"
Pardon my flippant treatment of the subject.
Does anyone know if the new HC-110 is the same as LegacyPro L110? If so, and given the fact that L110 has been available for several years, maybe someone could comment on the shelf life of L110. That might give us an idea of the shelf life of the new HC-110.
Best movie ever.General Turgidson there will be no fighting in the War Room
pentaxuser
I was talking about Japan, Germany and Sweden. US - Ha! And yes D-23 is all ya need!Free and fair elections in America??
Just mix your own, it's easy, if you can find the ingredients! D-23 forever!
Does anyone know if the new HC-110 is the same as LegacyPro L110? If so, and given the fact that L110 has been available for several years, maybe someone could comment on the shelf life of L110. That might give us an idea of the shelf life of the new HC-110.
By the way, the last time I checked at Freestyle (yesterday) the prices for HC-110 and L110 are almost the same on the basis of per liter of dilution B. The main difference is that L110 can be bought in smaller volume increments.Does anyone know if the new HC-110 is the same as LegacyPro L110? If so, and given the fact that L110 has been available for several years, maybe someone could comment on the shelf life of L110. That might give us an idea of the shelf life of the new HC-110.
I think it is hydroquinone.Any idea what the precipitate forming in the bottom of opened bottles is? The developer is still working as expected as far as I can tell, but obviously some ingredient is falling out of solution. Thankfully I use the solution up quickly enough that I haven't noticed much difference, though I have been very slightly increasing concentration as the developer ages and oxidizes. Next time I need more developer I'll have to look at my other options, this was a shoddily done substitution by Kodak.
Thanks for this note, I am glad to see this about L110 in a smaller size. If the new revised HC110 no longer has the multi-year keeping properties, I would prefer to buy less than one liter at a time since I might end up disposing more of it as aged out than I would use for developing. I normally use the stuff one shot at 1+63 and it takes me quite a while to go through a liter. I still have some of my stash of the syrupy stuff left, but the day to consider what comes next is moving closer.By the way, the last time I checked at Freestyle (yesterday) the prices for HC-110 and L110 are almost the same on the basis of per liter of dilution B. The main difference is that L110 can be bought in smaller volume increments.
I don't know that we have decided anything, as what we don't appear to have (yet) is data. I believe I have observed with the old version that moisture added increases the rate of degradation (seen as discoloration) -- this might suggest a water-based version could lack super long keeping properties. But at this point that is no more than idle speculation. I have been decanting one liter containers of the old stuff into a series of smaller clean, dry, Nalgene bottles filled to the brim, so that only my working container is subject to any possible contamination. That gets me out to three or four years of use unless I have a big surge of photo activity. Will a new version permit that -- dunno yet.I don't understand why everyone suddenly decided that the new HC-110 will not be stored for a long time? From the analysis of its composition, it can be seen that it contains a large amount of potassium sulfite. Comparable to Rodinal and similar concentrates.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?