Since I'm not yet fit to work on the workbench, I'm dealing with basic questions
One of them is
whether, as a repairer, you should aim to have complete mastery of a repair area/certain devices or to cover as much work as possible, even if you are not able to repair everything.
This may seem like a banal question at first glance, but it decides which path you take.
Because it makes a big difference whether you are dealing with the mechanics of a Minolta SR-T 303b or with the electronics of a Minolta X-700. These are different worlds, even if there are electronics in the SRT and, of course, mechanics in the X-700.
It takes time for training, an appropriately equipped workshop and knowledge that is not given to you in either mechanics or electronics.
I'm still traveling broadly now, but I think I'll stick to one topic and go into more depth. Because I have the ambition to explore and master a topic as much as possible. Even if this can never be completely the case because the technology is too complex or there is a lack of information, as is the rule with integrated electronic circuits.
What do you think about it? Which path or paths are you taking?
I started as a hobbyist 60 years ago.
After many unsatisfying years of being an employee as an electronics technician I started with being an entrepreneur as a computer technician and, as the market kicked me off, as a technician for cameras and lenses.
Based on my initial training as a radio & tv technician I teached myself everything else.
In this way I specialized on Nikon cameras and lenses but kept my eyes open for devices from other manufacturers.
Both changes from an employee to an entrepeneur were forced by unemployment and lack of prospects for a new job, so I had no other choice.
While computer manufacturing was following the market opportunities in the ninetees oft the last millennium,
repairing some photo equipment was turning my hobby into a career...
Sadly, I do not make "a living wage" doing this, but here in the USA its not possible to charge a fee for this kind of work that results in a living wage.
I'd rather master purely mechanical cameras, I find more appeal in the intricate mechanism that drive them, and the clever design that make all functions work together.
I do not despise electronics, but have way less fun with this.
Thanks for these insights
Why isn't this possible in the US? Is purchasing power too low or is there too much competition?
People aren't willing to pay what the work is worth (for Retina cameras). This is one major reason I have declined to add the Reflex models to my work list - this camera is so complex and time consuming to service (2 full days of labor) that nobody is interested in paying $400+ to service one. (I've had many inquiries, but when I quote the price, they all decline to get the work done)
If you're a Hasselblad technician, or a Rolleiflex specialist, then people will pay $300-$500 to get work done, but not "the lowly Retina".
The owner of a workshop in Vienna once told me that he looks after his customers' Leica collections.
One of his customers holds his cameras to his ears every day, turns the wheels and if he thinks he hears something suspicious, the repairman has to come and take a look. He makes a good living because wealthy customers almost don't care what they pay. The main thing is that their Leicas are fine.
You can do it too, but probably not with the Minolta X-700
I wouldn't want to have customers that required "house calls" every time they thought "something was wrong with the Baby"! No thanks, I'll stick with what I do.
You can do it too, but probably not with the Minolta X-700
My goal is to gain enough skill to do a CLA with a high level of competence. Enough so to start a small business after I retire. I've downloaded all of the old Canon tech documents for the platforms from sites like LearnCameraRepair.com and have been going through two correspondence courses on camera repair. One is from the early '70s and is from LCR. The other was given to me by a buddy of mine that is a retired camera repairmen that was active from around 1990 until around 2015 or so. The second course is full of a lot of good hand written notes concerning camera repair, but also on running a business. In those notes were the recommendation made to him to specialize and focus efforts on that niche market.
However the ugly truth is those 1980s cameras materials, like the plastic wheels , are not designed to work for 40years. Once this piece goes wrong then the camera/lens could be dead.
I object
On all the Minolta Xs I had on the workbench, the plastic gears in the camera base were ok. I saw no damage or wear even on well-used specimens.
Maybe?
I have seen too many broken wheels already. It is not user's fault but the material itself. I have seen plastics wheel cracked itself inside the camera. Those days I have no other options but either give it up, or make a metal wheels to replace. Of course today I can ask people with 3D printer to remake one.
Somehow I also believe the environment could be the cause. As for the palace when I am living now (Asia) with humid and hot weather the camera and lenses wear out faster than Europe .I never dare to take out my camera in Spring.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?