RPX 25 in Fomadon LQR

hankchinaski

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
156
Location
Glasgow
Format
Medium Format
Would somebody have an idea of the time for rpx 25 in fomadon lqr? They say it's like d-19, but I cannot find times for that either.
As an aside...the brochure for rpx 25 has these images, but an extensive search on flickr shows exactly zero photos looking like the samples...



 
Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Messages
840
Location
World
Format
35mm
Don't use Fola LQR or Kodak D19 with anything that is Agfa Aviphot-related. That includes Rollei Rpx25.
It's an hi-contrast film and hi-contrast developers.
Unless you're going for crazy contrast.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,377
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
As an aside...the brochure for rpx 25 has these images, but an extensive search on flickr shows exactly zero photos looking like the samples...

It's a B&W film. It can look like pretty much anything depending on how the product was used. Exposure, development and in particular choices in printing and/or digital post-processing have a vast impact on the final image. So results may vary from very contrasty images with large areas of open shadows and harsh highlights all the way to buttery-smooth & soft 'infinite grayscale' tonality. It's mostly a matter of how much exposure you give and how the negatives are then post-processed or printing, with development being a factor of moderately high influence behind these two.
 
OP
OP

hankchinaski

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
156
Location
Glasgow
Format
Medium Format
Don't use Fola LQR or Kodak D19 with anything that is Agfa Aviphot-related. That includes Rollei Rpx25.
It's an hi-contrast film and hi-contrast developers.
Unless you're going for crazy contrast.

Thanks for the advice!

But these images are both developed in Rodinal 1+25, I can't understand the difference in contrast, even accounting for the fact that one image was probably taken in the dull of winter and the other in full sunshine.




 
Last edited:
OP
OP

hankchinaski

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
156
Location
Glasgow
Format
Medium Format
Thanks Koraks.

I would disagree with the development factor. Taking FP4 as an example, I was able to make horridly gray images, especially with high dilution Rodinal, or exciting high-contrast images with LQR (you can ignore the esthetic judgments...)
 

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,445
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
Contrast can be tamed but it needs the right developer, I've found some 'normal' developers don't work well with it. The last time I used RPX-25 I used Adox FX-39 1+9 7.5 mins @20c and the contrast is excellent, metering for the mid tones. But my beef with RPX is that it isn't actually very sharp or grain free, Adox HR-50 is much better.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,377
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I would disagree with the development factor.

That's OK; I guess I've gotten a little cynical due to my experience that there's always a way to either boost the contrast on a horribly flat and/or thin negative or smash flat an exceedingly long-scaled one, one way or another, and in particular in digital space. It's generally easier if you have something that fits the purpose to begin with, of course. To that extent, development does indeed make a difference. But proper exposure and flexibility in the printing or post processing part are IMO overpowering factors, ultimately. Things are different if you need to print on an essentially fixed-contrast output medium.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…