Photographing sports with a Graflex is a delightful throwback to the 1940s and 1950s. Think Mickey Mantle and Ted Williams.*
Rhodes seems to have worried that his resulting photographs were not up-to-par, but based that on his comparison to his own digital efforts. Once he was able to get past and let go of that, they strongly stood on their own. As they should.
I've been a Sports Illustrated subscriber for over 40 years. I feel their move to digital imaging from film photography, although quite understandable from deadline and financial pressure perspectives, has been devastating from a depth-of-content point-of-view. Shallow digital effects now rule the publication. If I have to look at yet one more overly-sharpened overly-saturated enormous depth-of-field gimmick image, I'm gonna' scream.
On the other hand, with the recent passing of boxer Rubin (Hurricane) Carter, SI had the opportunity to again publish some thoughtfully intense black-and-white film photographs of Carter in action. Grain and all, they are simply marvelous. The hand (and especially the mind) of the photographer being strongly present and felt. At least by me.
Ken
*American baseball...