I've moved some 6 times since I picked up slide film, so my woods keep changing. Last one was for 10 years and in that time I yes, enjoyed this a little bit. However - photography is light and the same subject can either sing or cry at any given lighting. Changing seasons helps too as the scenery keeps changing. That said, doing BW reversal requires heaps of testing, so go out and do test shoots of familiar subjects I did. This actually can improve your photography - training yourself is training.Slide film shooters, do you ever feel that it has become a waste of time (let alone cost) to even attempt to find something worth shooting in your neck of the woods?
No. I'm aware that I do this for the love of film and projection. If I cannot project at superb quality, cannot buy E-6 for a price that is reasonable or reverse my own BW Slides - I'm not even interested in shooting like at all. Large format and glass plates one day - that tickles my curiosity a bit, but digital - no. Just no. I don't like the digital workflow and the endless possibilities, leaving me wanting something I don't even know what. I like to do it in camera, not post. Soo - no slides, no photography to me. Plenty of other chores to enjoy - like vinyl collecting and book reading, or trying to be an Extreme Metal vocalist...Do you agonize over it to the point of taking your digital camera out instead?
As many as required and when light commands it. Therefore I moved to BW slides - waaaaay cheaper than E-6. Sharper and punchier too. Especially when comparing BW slide next to Ektachrome E100 that displays very, very poor performance in terms of sharpness, detail retention and color balance.How many times are you willing to use expensive slide film to repeatedly shoot the same scenes and subjects?
Yes, 10+ years ago. But then I picked up BW reversal and grew as a photographer.Has it ever made you seriously evaluate the continued use of film?
Slide film shooters, do you ever feel that it has become a waste of time (let alone cost) to even attempt to find something worth shooting in your neck of the woods? Do you agonize over it to the point of taking your digital camera out instead?
Has it ever made you seriously evaluate the continued use of film?
How are you using the slide film. Are you projecting? If so, are there even any digital projectors? So I wonder how one could even compare the two?
How are you using the slide film. Are you projecting? If so, are there even any digital projectors? So I wonder how one could even compare the two?
Slide film shooters, do you ever feel that it has become a waste of time (let alone cost) to even attempt to find something worth shooting in your neck of the woods? Do you agonize over it to the point of taking your digital camera out instead?
How many times are you willing to use expensive slide film to repeatedly shoot the same scenes and subjects?
Has it ever made you seriously evaluate the continued use of film?
Slide film shooters, do you ever feel that it has become a waste of time (let alone cost) to even attempt to find something worth shooting in your neck of the woods? Do you agonize over it to the point of taking your digital camera out instead?
How many times are you willing to use expensive slide film to repeatedly shoot the same scenes and subjects?
Has it ever made you seriously evaluate the continued use of film?
Shooting slides vs digital is a philosophical matter, so I would say if you are worried about the cost of film and/or the quality of your photographs from a cost/enjoyment perspective, why not take a break from film to regroup creatively? Instead of agonizing over whether to use film or digital just use digital for a while and focus on the seeing.
Incidentally for anyone in a creative rut or trying to improve the one little book I continue to recommend is Freeman Patterson’s Photography and the Art of Seeing. My two cents, this is the “instructional” book I find most likely to concretely improve picture-taking (if indeed such a thing is possible) and it never gets old. The companion book (of sorts) Photography for the Joy of It is also wonderful.
My biggest issue right now other than running out of new things to shoot is contending with our Colorado winter sunlight from hell (think of long, dark shadows cast on virtually everything).
I have been diversifying the types of formats I have been shooting lately only to find myself largely dissatisfied.
I read both books, and they did help for a time. Maybe I should take another look at them.
My biggest issue right now other than running out of new things to shoot is contending with our Colorado winter sunlight from hell (think of long, dark shadows cast on virtually everything).
Well, Patterson would probably suggest his “sideways thinker” approach to the problem (how can I make something out of the sunlight from hell rather than be deterred by it)but you know that already.
Which formats have you been trying and what is it about them that has been dissatisfying relative to what you had been using?
Are they technical matters or is it more like it doesn’t “feel right”?
My apologies ... I should have said I'm using a KR3 filter at the moment, because it's really gloomy overcast Hound of the Baskervilles weather. Ordinarily, a KR3 is a bit too strong, and in most cases, a KR1.5 or 1B skylight would be preferable for general Ektar usage. So it all depends on just how much warming you really need.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?