stability of 'sunny 16'

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,981
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Since you've posted this, we've had two unusually cloudy days here in Honolulu. Maybe later it will clear up.
 

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
How did you get to 14.66.I get an even 15 at f/16 and 1/100/s

EV = log2(N2 / t)
EV = log2(1/t) + 2log2(N)

log2(100) = 6.64
2log2(16) = 8
=> 14+2/3

27 = 128 not 100. 1/125 is a pretty good approximation of 1/128, so f/16 1/125 is EV15. That Wikipedia link above even has a nice table showing that EV15 at f/16 is t=1/125. Or you could look at the EV dial on a spot meter, like the Pentax DSM has.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,603
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
Ralph! How do you figure that f/16 and 1/100 s is EV15? It's 14.66666666666 as Polyglot pointed out but if you read it off a meter it would either show 14.7 or 14 and 2/3 depending on which meter you use.
 

chiller

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
234
Location
Adelaide Aus
Format
Multi Format
This may have been covered but isn't the sunny 16 rule derived from the reciprocity of the iso at f16? therefore f16 @ 1/100 for iso 100. Not 1/125th which is .3 EV difference. Also how are people arriving at their EV readings? Incident or reading a grey card and are you basing the reading angled incident to the camera lens or directly at the sun?

If you are using a grey card and a reflected meter how you position the card can vary the EV reading or calculated reading. Practically an incident meter is the only consistent way to determine sunny 16
 
Last edited by a moderator:

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,981
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Honolulu, 21.3° N, 3:40pm

EV 15.0 at ISO 100, Minolta Flashmeter III, incident reading
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,110
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
This may have been covered but isn't the sunny 16 rule derived from the reciprocity of the iso at f16? therefore f16 @ 1/100 for iso 100. Not 1/125th which is .3 EV difference.

No. As I wrote earlier, its the closest shutter speed to 1/ISO which on modern cameras would be 1/125.

It's not supposed to be something accurate to two decimal places! It's a close approximation to get acceptably exposed negatives in the normal range of daylight in the absence of a light meter.


Steve.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mauro35

Member
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
219
Location
Finland
Format
35mm
Is that why you guys drink so much?I know, I would.

Indeed, the autumn is so dark people need some medication...I am actually not originally from Finland, so it doesn´t work for me, I try practicing long exposure skills instead..
It´s a shame I don not own a good exposure meter, cause with sunny f/16 I tend to get a bit too low a shadow density. I prefer sunny f/11 in summer and even f/8 in autumn without snow. But OTOH who knows how accurate is my shutter speed.
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format

Ralph's OP asks for the following:
Ralph Lambrecht said:
Please take your incident meters,meters,step outside,point the dome directly into the sun and take an EV reading.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,110
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Please take your incident meters,meters,step outside,point the dome directly into the sun and take an EV reading.

Whilst this method will probably give a more consistent reading of the sun's intensity around the world, a real incident reading should be with the meter pointing at the camera from the subject rather than directly at the light source.


Steve.
 
OP
OP

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,551
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Whilst this method will probably give a more consistent reading of the sun's intensity around the world, a real incident reading should be with the meter pointing at the camera from the subject rather than directly at the light source.


Steve.

good;then we are OKbecause,the consistency of the sun's intensityaround the world is what I'm trying to verify.
thank you ll for your help and comments.
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
But you're not being asked to measure your palm
 

DannL.

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
617
Format
Large Format

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,603
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm

That's modern camera of the 80's. More modern cameras do have shutter speed of 1/100 as they are in 1/3 stop increments.
 

Curt

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,620
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format

Steve, you just missed the shot! The ship sailed right past while you were looking up the correct exposure!
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,110
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
That's modern camera of the 80's. More modern cameras do have shutter speed of 1/100 as they are in 1/3 stop increments.

You mean old modern cameras!


Steve.
 
OP
OP

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,551
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

shutter speeds can easily vary by 1/3 stop,depending on temperature. on the other hand ,apeture settings are usually very accurate and consistent+-0.1 stops.if you can measure your shutter speedsand trust your aperture settings.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,366
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
The grand majority of meters are probably very close to right.

The problem is that 'right' can mean a deviation of about 1/3 EV, measuring the same light with a dozen different meters...the ISO calibration equation allows meter manufactures to choose their own 'constant', resulting in 1/3 EV difference from brand to brand. Then, if you take multiple units of the same brand and model, deviations between even units of the same brand and model can result in not perfect agreement!

So if the experiment is to read location specific differences, you immediately have lots of error -- even if the sun was IDENTICAL at all sample locations (or the folks were standing side by side)!

BTW, for the experiment, location latitude N37 degrees 31 minutes, observation at 13.30 PDT: EV15.9
 
Last edited by a moderator:

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,366
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
on the other hand ,apeture settings are usually very accurate and consistent+-0.1 stops.if you can measure your shutter speedsand trust your aperture settings.

It used to be that Modern Photography and Popular Photography both measured actual max aperture (as well as the true FL) vs. the rated max aperture and FL, and they would publish the results. Here are some examples, and notice the two examples of lenses tested by BOTH magazines...sample-to-sample variations!

  • Rated OM 35mm f/2.8, actual 35.51mm f/2.73 (Popular Photography)
  • Rated OM 35mm f/2.8, actual 35.1mm f/2.81 (Modern Photography)
  • Rated OM 100mm f/2, actual 100.83mm f/2.1 (Popular Photography)
  • Rated OM 100mm f/2, actual 100.65mm f/2.05 (Modern Photography)
  • Rated OM 21mm f/2, actual 20.15mm f/1.91 (Modern Photography)
  • Rated OM 24mm f/2.8, actual 25.1mm f/2.93 (Modern Photography)
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…