Those who take and those who make

OP
OP

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,485
Format
35mm RF
I suppose a prime example of a Taker would be Fox Talbot who was trying to find a recording medium for the image and a prime example of a Maker would be someone painting a picture with pixels on photoshop, that had no underlying photographic image.
 

Chuck_P

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
2,369
Location
Kentucky
Format
4x5 Format
Don_ih said:
You make all the decisions regarding what the photo should be prior to pressing the shutter.
Click to expand...

I agree.

I also agree the take/make distinction seems nonsensical, but here I am expounding on the concept, probably poorly at that. It's a process, not an event. This concept of "taking" never enters my thought process; I like the word "record". The process has a beginning and you work toward the end, and when you reach the end, you have made something, imo. The process kind of breaks down a bit for me when I consign myself to only wanting to reach the end via LrC, when I simply come to the conclusion that I will not expend paper on a particular negative. So, I reach my own end either on the computer screen with a negative scan or on paper in the darkroom under the enlarger, with something I can hold in my hands. At both ends, I believe I've 'made' something and I haven't 'taken' anything. But, I have "recorded" what I saw.......................and I am most satisfied when the end of the process is on paper, the accomplishment feeling is much greater and it's the ultimate end I strive to meet.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,558
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

a taker accepts the scene and finds a composition in it, such as a landscape or street photographer. A maker designs the scene with the composition in mind, such as a studio or tabletop photographer.
 
OP
OP

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,485
Format
35mm RF
It seems that as the history of photography progresses, we do more making and less Taking/Recording.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,671
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
Here is one for those still following.. Edward Weston gained his fame from making artsy out of focus fuzzy platinum portraits until he became disgusted with it. Then he became committed to photographing "The thing itself", everything sharp and printed on glossy silver gelatin paper so nothing could be hidden or disguised and he stopped or tried to stop retouching portraits. So did he go from a maker to a taker?
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
2,923
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
cliveh said:
It seems that as the history of photography progresses, we do more making and less Taking/Recording.
Click to expand...

I'd suggest that the tens of thousands of daily iphone photos disprove your claim....
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,006
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Alan Edward Klein said:
I "shoot" a camera and "take" a shot. Maybe "snap" a picture. Who says "make"? Maybe when I become famous.
Click to expand...
Who says 'make'? Artists.

Artists create -- which is a type of 'making'.

A camera is not a gun, and nothing at all like a gun, but if people wish to reference guns/hunting in connection to their use of cameras, that's cool. To 'shoot' a camera is well established in our various languages and is here to stay. I guess it makes photography feel like a much more macho activity...
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,579
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
I checked my analog dictionary and the first definitions for make were to bring into existence and to cause to exist, create by forming or modifying materials and on and on. As far as take it was to get into one’s possession, to capture physically and to put down an image, likeness of or by as photography as well as on and on. So it seems to me that either is okay
To paraphrase Jerry Lee Lewis “there’s a whole lot of makin and takin going on “.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,329
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
cliveh said:
I suppose a prime example of a Taker would be Fox Talbot who was trying to find a recording medium for the image and a prime example of a Maker would be someone painting a picture with pixels on photoshop, that had no underlying photographic image.
Click to expand...

That's what I assumed you meant. But, in photography discussion, the term "make a photograph" also refers to what you're calling "take a photograph". So most of the discussion here has been along those lines. Very few people who use film do much in the way of image manipulation (beyond the straightforward stuff like cropping, dust-removal, contrast adjustment, dodging-and-burning). So that leads people to consider the casual snapshot as taking a photo and the more careful selection of composition, focus, exposure, aperture, lighting - even of a spontaneous scene (like street photography - to be making a photo.

Then there's what Ralph said, which is taking a photo is when you aren't the creator or arranger of what's being photographed and making is when you have control over or have created what you're photographing (like a still-life, models in a studio, etc.).

So we're all talking about different things. As usual.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,105
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Does it really matter whether one makes or takes OR both? I happen to do both.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,334
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Daniela said:
I'm afraid the discussion needs to restart. There are also those who build...
Click to expand...
Dang... another verb to wrestle over. I know for a fact that I don't build photos but know at least one photographer who does/did.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,329
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Daniela said:
I'm afraid the discussion needs to restart. There are also those who build...
Click to expand...

No. No one "builds" photos. There's just no comparison between building and photographing. Building is genuinely complex and tends to involve many different people with completely different skills.

Maybe building in a way similar to making something out of Lego....
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Jeff Wall builds - or perhaps constructs - photographs, in the way that directors put together movies.
His 1994 image, entitled "Untangling":



It is a colour cibachrome transparency on a light box
Measurements: 207.1 × 241.0 × 26.2 cm
The print made in 2006 is in the collection of the National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,329
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Building a set, working to establish an elaborate scene - are exactly that. Taking the photo is nothing more than composing, setting exposure, clicking the shutter.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,334
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Don_ih said:
Building a set, working to establish an elaborate scene - are exactly that. Taking the photo is nothing more than composing, setting exposure, clicking the shutter.
Click to expand...

Not if the goal of building that elaborate scene was specifically to produce a photograph. But if you parse it into those two elements as if they might not be related then, sure, that's a perspective.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
And what part of photography is visualizing the intended result in the first place?
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,329
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
MattKing said:
And what part of photography is visualizing the intended result in the first place?
Click to expand...

That's called "photography". But visualization is not actually a photo. Nor is it building.

It's easy to see you guys have never built anything.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,334
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
LOL. I'm going to have a Scotch. Santa left me some Johnnie Walker Blue.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,891
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Don_ih said:
That's called "photography". But visualization is not actually a photo. Nor is it building.

It's easy to see you guys have never built anything.
Click to expand...

Perhaps your definition of "building" is narrower than for some.
 

Chuck_P

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
2,369
Location
Kentucky
Format
4x5 Format
MattKing said:
And what part of photography is visualizing the intended result in the first place?
Click to expand...

I don't know, it's not worth pursuing, I'm just glad you didn't say........"pre-visualizing".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…