XTOL Replenishment, Seasoned Developer Amount

Super Slide

A
Super Slide

  • 2
  • 3
  • 82
Double Casino

A
Double Casino

  • 1
  • 0
  • 54
Holy Pool

A
Holy Pool

  • 2
  • 2
  • 99
Ugliness

Ugliness

  • 1
  • 3
  • 134
Passing....

A
Passing....

  • 6
  • 4
  • 131

Forum statistics

Threads
197,336
Messages
2,757,685
Members
99,463
Latest member
Dmitry K
Recent bookmarks
1

Dan Rainer

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2024
Messages
16
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
Multi Format
I've been using XTOL 1:1 for a while, but more and more I've found myself gravitating towards a stock XTOL replenishment system. Obviously the larger the preparation of seasoned developer, the better (slight variations in replenishment amount and byproduct residue will have have a diminished impact at larger scales). I have a 1x, 2x, and 3x 35mm Paterson tank and almost never use more than one liter of developer. Currently I have my replenished XTOL stored in a 1L amber glass bottle. Is this sufficient, or should I upgrade to a 1 gallon datatainer?
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,771
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I believe that larger volume of Xtol-R is more reliable/consistent....and that is what I have been using for the past few years, but if the 1 litre amount has been working for you, why change it? @MattKing is an expert in regards to Xtol-R, so he'll be able to give you a much more thorough answer.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,188
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I agree with Andrew, if you get good results no need to go to a larger "tank volume". I ran a 2 L soda bottle volume of XTOL when I was using 1/2 US gallon Kodak hard rubber tanks for sheet film and Paterson tanks for roll film. It worked perfectly!!!
 
OP
OP
Dan Rainer

Dan Rainer

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2024
Messages
16
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
Multi Format
I believe that larger volume of Xtol-R is more reliable/consistent....and that is what I have been using for the past few years, but if the 1 litre amount has been working for you, why change it?

I agree with Andrew, if you get good results no need to go to a larger "tank volume".
I've only been using replenished XTOL for a few months, and while it's working fine so far, I want to make sure I'm not setting myself up for headaches down the road.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,837
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
My container of seasoned XTol is a half US gallon container which I fill to near the brim, so the actual volume is close to 2 liters.
One thing I always do to help support consistency is to always use the maximum recommended amount of seasoned developer in each tank I use - usually 1 litre in the 1 litre Paterson Super System tank.
And after each round of development, the amount of replenisher gets added to the working strength bottle, before that bottle is topped up with the developer that I have just used to develop film. I find it handy to have a large measuring graduate - the 2 litre Paterson graduate is great - as an intermediate vessel for recently used developer - empty the developing tank into that graduate, and then when it is convenient pour from that graduate into the working strength storage bottle until it is topped up.
I don't know whether "expert" is the right designation for me, but I've done this now for a fairly long time, with a decent amount of film, and paid close attention to how to make it work well as well as the information that is out there.
 
OP
OP
Dan Rainer

Dan Rainer

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2024
Messages
16
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Matt, this is super helpful. I'll probably ended up going to a 1/2 gallon or two liter jug and using my seasoned liter with a liter of fresh stock.
I don't know whether "expert" is the right designation for me, but I've done this now for a fairly long time, with a decent amount of film, and paid close attention to how to make it work well as well as the information that is out there.
Labels aside, I've seen your contributions on other threads about this topic and really appreciate your insight 🤘
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,091
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I've been using XTOL 1:1 for a while, but more and more I've found myself gravitating towards a stock XTOL replenishment system. Obviously the larger the preparation of seasoned developer, the better (slight variations in replenishment amount and byproduct residue will have have a diminished impact at larger scales). I have a 1x, 2x, and 3x 35mm Paterson tank and almost never use more than one liter of developer. Currently I have my replenished XTOL stored in a 1L amber glass bottle. Is this sufficient, or should I upgrade to a 1 gallon datatainer?

I replenish with stock XTOL. XTOL 1:1 approximated replenish XTOL. Just stick to stock XTOL added to replenished XTOL [not 1:1] and you will be saving money while getting the advantages of replenishment.
 

K-G

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
544
Location
Goth, Sweden
Format
Multi Format
I posted this in another Xtol thread a few weeks ago and I think it can be used here also. I mix my Xtol with de-ionized water , I keep the replenished solution in a 10 L jar in order to keep the volume/surface relationship as high as possible , I fill it to the top and let it bleed off so there isn't the smallest air bubble left. Then I close tightly and I keep it in the dark. I started this batch sometime during 2016 and it still works fine. Before using the solution I filter it through a coffee-filter ( disposable !!!!! ) in order to get rid of some junk that always forms.

Karl-Gustaf

Karl-Gustaf Hellqvist
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,837
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I agree with the recommendation for careful choice of mixing water. I happen to use grocery store bought distilled water, which unfortunately comes most economically and conveniently in 4 litre containers around here.
4 litres is, however, enough to use for initially mixing in the dry chemicals. One just needs to source that extra litre ...
I doubt it is necessary to store it in the dark, but out of direct sunlight and in reasonably temperate temperature conditions is important. I expect that if I had more room, I probably would use a larger container for the working solution.
In my case, I do my filtering from time to time, but usually I filter the developer that has just been used. Mostly I expect the filtering removes gelatin that came from the film.
FWIW, I also pre-rinse before developing the films. I have no idea if that helps or hurts or makes any difference at all. But if I change my process, I might bring on bad luck :smile:
 
OP
OP
Dan Rainer

Dan Rainer

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2024
Messages
16
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
Multi Format
I posted this in another Xtol thread a few weeks ago and I think it can be used here also. I mix my Xtol with de-ionized water , I keep the replenished solution in a 10 L jar in order to keep the volume/surface relationship as high as possible , I fill it to the top and let it bleed off so there isn't the smallest air bubble left. Then I close tightly and I keep it in the dark. I started this batch sometime during 2016 and it still works fine. Before using the solution I filter it through a coffee-filter ( disposable !!!!! ) in order to get rid of some junk that always forms.

Karl-Gustaf

Karl-Gustaf Hellqvist

What size tanks/trays are you working with? 10L sounds very heavy and unwieldy, at least for my workflow. I develop 1-2 times per week on average.
 
OP
OP
Dan Rainer

Dan Rainer

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2024
Messages
16
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
Multi Format
I agree with the recommendation for careful choice of mixing water. I happen to use grocery store bought distilled water, which unfortunately comes most economically and conveniently in 4 litre containers around here.
I use distilled grocery store water for my chemistry too
FWIW, I also pre-rinse before developing the films. I have no idea if that helps or hurts or makes any difference at all. But if I change my process, I might bring on bad luck :smile:
I was wondering if pre-rinse would be detrimental to the replenishment. Good to know it isn't! Which films do you mostly process?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,837
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I use distilled grocery store water for my chemistry too

I was wondering if pre-rinse would be detrimental to the replenishment. Good to know it isn't! Which films do you mostly process?

T-Max 400 and T-Max 100 almost exclusively.
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,458
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I keep my replenished (working solution) in a one gallon Boston brown glass jug and use the remainder of the 5 liter mix to use as a replenisher mix. The replenisher is stored in a wine bladder type bag. I really wouldn't want to handle much larger than a gallon jug of developer, but that's just me. I use nothing but distilled water and filter my stock before I develop film. It's been foolproof for me and very consistent.
 

K-G

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
544
Location
Goth, Sweden
Format
Multi Format
What size tanks/trays are you working with? 10L sounds very heavy and unwieldy, at least for my workflow. I develop 1-2 times per week on average.
Yes, the jar is a bit clumsy, but as I develop about once every month or two months it is no great problem. It use to be 10 - 15 rolls in 3 - 4 Paterson tanks in the size for either two or five reels for 35 mm film. So far everything has worked fine.

Karl-Gustaf
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,025
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
When I've run Xtol replenished I kept the working solution in a 2L PET beverage bottle -- my largest developing vessel is my Yankee Agitank, which wants 1.6 liters to cover 4x5 (one sheet or twelve). I think 2 liters is about the minimum I'd want to replenish; as noted, the larger your tank solution volume, the less small replenishment errors or variations in negative density matter.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,091
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The larger the replenished XTOL container, the more likely that the balance between added stock replenishment is consistent throughout the volume.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom