- Joined
- May 28, 2005
- Messages
- 518
- Format
- 4x5 Format
6x7 is only "ideal" in the mind of someone who marketed it as such long ago. There is no one ideal format for every image and photographer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk and 100% recycled electrons - because I care.
I think 6x6 was called "ideal", because it's the format closest in aspect ratio to 8x10 photographic paper.
[ ... ] I often print 10" square with a 1/2" border all around on 11x14 paper. The long side provides some test strips. Likewise, 7x7 square on 8x10 paper with a couple of 1" test strips off the end.
Okay, you´re right, should have added multiple choices from the beginning.
Okay, you´re right, should have added multiple choices from the beginning.
It's the shiny sideI'm confused. With 6x6, how do you tell which side of the film itself is up?
I´m quite stunned that so many are shooting 6x9. I had expected 6x6 and 6x7 to be popular, but 6x9 is a surprise. Since I don´t think that all votes come from people who use Fuji rangefinders I wonder: do you use old folders and box cameras, roll film backs on LF and the like?
I´m quite stunned that so many are shooting 6x9. I had expected 6x6 and 6x7 to be popular, but 6x9 is a surprise. Since I don´t think that all votes come from people who use Fuji rangefinders I wonder: do you use old folders and box cameras, roll film backs on LF and the like?
I tried 6x9 and it was like using a huge 35mm camera. For me 6x6 works amazing. I would love to try 6x7 though
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?