Maybe me wanting them to be extremely transparent is unreasonable.
Well, some weeks ago you started a thread about Adox in which you were critical about that firm not employing pre-paid production of a product that to their saying was ready but not economic at current prices.
We discussed this in along thread. You were repeatedly advised to negotiate this issue with Adox and even make a respective offer as you or your firm alone already had a substantial need for that product.
But on repeated request on the outcome you only replied with "I don't owe anyone anything".
I'm excited and don't mind waiting another month for Adox Helios. If it is indeed an inexpensive color film, and if it isn't too expensive to ship to the US, I would love to try it. It depends how low "low speed" actually is. If it's 25ISO I'd buy it, but if it's like the repurposed print film that FPP sells at under 2ISO I wouldn't use it. I have been wanting to try something around 25ISO anyway, so I hope that's around what the speed is.
Well, you were even not willing for transparency, on an issue you raised yourself. Then raising the issue of transparency at the one you criticized puts you into the glasshouse.
Not that we all never sat there...
Thank you!
A manufacturer should be happy to be even approached for a risk-free way of earning money and at least send a respective reply.
Silberra doesn't even use some old stock, it's just Kodak Aerocolor IVJust like Silberra is doing
I'm questioning the ability of Adox to produce any kind of real color film themselves; Mirko has said in a talk that it would take hundreds of millions and many engineers to come up with a film that might even compare to a Ferrania film.
Suddenly they have couplers, sensitizers and all the other jazz figured out? At least be honest if you've got a few vats of chemicals that you've got laying around and now are making some kind of film concoction and try to make some money out of it (fairly so, I want Adox to succeed); but at least be honest towards the people that are asking the questions. And maybe also let your most loyal darkroom printers know wether we will be seeing MCC/PWE paper anywhere in the upcoming 5 years.
Suddenly they have couplers, sensitizers and all the other jazz figured out?
They say the sun should be out. Which implies for hand held shots. I'd expect a sensitivity similar to CMS 20 II. Around iso12.
Of HELIOS we have enough to release 20 times more then of COLOR MISSION I.
This. ADOX the film company with the lowest corporate Dmin and base fog.Well it seems to me that ADOX has met the transparency test that haliderollei was applying.
About Helios I stated three main technical aspects:
If it is that low I may try a roll or two. I recently saw a man talking about using Kodachrome 25 and he explained how at 25ISO it was generally usable in the daytime, which is why the 25 keeps sticking in my head. At that speed I could make it work. I don't generally like to carry a tripod. But at half the speed it becomes a little harder.
The prospect of actually having availability is the best part, though. So I'm still looking forward to it.
Shooting low ISO speed film w/o a tripod is easy if it is sunny!
I just shot ISO 1.6 film. Using Sunny F16 = 1/60 sec @ f2.8
It is a bit more complicated. We have to differenciate whether one uses a very low ISO film out of necessity or because one choses it for its specific emulsion features, as typically low graininess ad high resolution. If one needs the high resolution then higher requirements apply to camera steadiness.
whether one uses a very low ISO film out of necessity or because one choses it for its specific emulsion features, as typically low graininess ad high resolution.
terrible
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?