IMO a lot of what happens at weddings is vanity
Of course. The whole essence of a wedding is to make people/society witness the act of engaging in a durable bond. As such, it's an inherently exhibitionist act.
IMO a lot of what happens at weddings is vanity
My value proposition is from the perspective of the client. Having attended dozens of weddings over the past two decades (with cinematographers present at all) and having missed a few, too, I have not heard about anyone sharing the videos. No doubt there are cases where granny cannot come due to physical inability to travel, and sharing the video with her makes a lot of sense. It does seem an expensive way to share only in such limited cases; it is likely shared only with the mom and dad of each side of the ceremony, for reminiscence (but, again, how often does it ever get viewed?!) I cannot say that I ever saw my wife stiing to view the still photos from daughters' weddings...they have occasionally been 'run acrossed' and flipped thru, but a video is intentional and not 'run acrossed'
What a shame. Maybe if there had been physical albums sent to you. On the other hand, when was the last time you looked at your wedding album? And, unless it is on a wall somewhere, a wedding photo at all?
I find that between videographers and still photographers, they're all over the place and it takes away the enjoyment for guests. Everything is part of a production like a Hollywood movie. They're underfoot.
One place I worked a very long time ago had an employee who was spectacularly good at restoration of old photos. His skills with copy negatives were amazing.
But in the addition to this, he was employed to do another type of work, the nature of which turns out to be a fore-runner of sorts.
He was doing a lot of work copying wedding and family photos, and then re-printing them in an edited form - with one or more of the subjects no longer to be seen!
Mostly ex-spouses/ex son-in-laws/ex daughters-in-law I seem to recall.
As is true of wedding photography 40 years ago, the specific photographer/team has a lot to do with degree of obtrusiveness. One could detect the differences then, once can still detect differences currently.
- Denis Reggie made his coverage popular in the 'photojounalistic style' and was sought by the 'rich or famous', and the style was popularized in part by sponsorship by Hasselblad.
Contrast his style with the 'classic' coverage in which cake cutting is posed, etc. Guest shots are posed. With a photojournalistic background, I mimiced Reggie more than the classic photographer, incorporating both approaches at different points in the day...formal group wedding party, yet guest candids and events like cake cut/feed.- A few years ago we attended a wedding in which the bride and groom were constantly 'directed' by the photographers, who even orchestrated the sequence of events during the wedding and reception; very obtrusive
OTOH we attended a wedding last week that had both photogrpher and videographer who were scarcely noticeable, and only they 'took over' for group photos of the wedding party before the reception dinner started.
IMO a lot of what happens at weddings is vanity. I shot weddings professionally for 30 years and it appeared to me, that the bigger the budget, the bigger the ego of the couple.
I was getting paid so who am I to complain?
After thrity years of marriage, some couples begin to want to see proof that they were really married after all.
…..Only a few exist and I really doubt that my grown children will even be interested in them. Old photographs are only passed around between family members when they get old to say do you remember Uncle Zerb, or some other forgotten relative. All the artistic and travel photos go in the dump.
It occurs to me that a family album, even an anonymous one without annotations, that covers a few generations, has a narrative of its own that can be quite interesting.
Although maybe not as important or historically significantnot as old photos of glaciers and locations may prove to be, there was in interesting case recently at the Los Angeles County of Art involving a small portrait of Frida Kahlo by Diego Rivera. Apparently, Rivera painted only one easel portrait of Kahlo (although she was often included in his murals) and LACMA had it in their collection. It was not dated, but they estimated it to have been made around 1939. The L.A. Times art critic had been going through the Smithsonian Institute's Juley archives, researching photos of Kahlo and Rivera and came across a photo of the painting. It was clearly dated 1935, rendering it significant because that was the year the couple split--so the portrait was possibly an expression of Rivera's longing for Kahlo.What is often overlooked is that past photos can have significance to historians and anthropologics...
Recent rediscovered photos depict life in Gaza before a seven-year blockade brought Gaza to its knees, and before Hamas took power, 70-80 years ago the city had a totally different cultural identity and feel,
- while the people themselves are of no great significance, their way of life, their manner of dress, their activities all chronicle life at one point in time,
- and the state of existence of geographic points in time, in the buildings present, the state of the streets (dirt, gravelled, paved) and fixtures (gas lights, incandescent lights, sodium vapor),
- and significant events in time like major floods, Olympic events, assisnations of major figures
- even the depiction of significant points in the evolution of inventions like flexible phones, EVs, even personal computing devices
- recorded existence of significant objects at one point in time that no longer exist due to natural or man-caused reasons
I took photos of many large chunks of ice which had broken off glaciers and were floating in a lake in Patagonia during the 1980's, and someone who had travelled to the same locattion in more recent times reported it was now largely clear of ice, the effect of global warming.
![]()
This was shot on 6x4.5 color transparency in 1986, and this much ice was present in November, which is shortly prior to their 'summer'.
Franz Joseph Glacier, taken by me in 2006...
![]()
and more recent photo https://www.theguardian.com/environ...nd-of-the-ice-new-zealands-vanishing-glaciers
![]()
and only 15 years ago the glacier had extended out to where the valley flattens out to level terrain, it is evident that it has retreated back within the valley, between the opposing slopes.
...How many of these will be lost due to digital recording, with few paper copies of what was recorded?!
We might not be passing them to historian/anthropologists, but their continued existence means that they can potentially be rediscovered and their value realized.
It occurs to me that a family album, even an anonymous one without annotations, that covers a few generations, has a narrative of its own that can be quite interesting.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |