Appreciation of Andre Kertesz
-
A
- Thread starter cliveh
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
Free Free to good home,old Compur shutter
- Started by absalom1951
-
For Sale FS: Toyo Super Wide Camera for Schneider Super Angulon 47mm XL Lens
- Started by B.S.Kumar
-
For Sale CHEAP: Really cool Canon A1 w. 50mm lens AND Hippie Strap
- Started by summicron1
Forum statistics
While I appreciate most of his work, with some exceptions, the Polaroids in his later life shine through for me, mostly due to how different they were compared to his earlier photographs.
Below taken in 1982
Below taken in 1982
And my very favourite. This is from MOMA: you often see it printed lighter, which I don't like at all as much. It's reproduced as a contact (52x37mm) in André Kertész: the early years, Norton, 2005.
Europe of Cultures - André Kertész in New York - Ina.fr
The photographer André Kertész continuously photographs the New York quarter of Washington Square, from his twelfth floor terrace.
fresques.ina.fr
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,644
- Format
- 8x10 Format
His work was certainly poetic. The staircase image is one of my favorites. And I personally agree with his terse assessment of Avedon as an Advertising Photographer and "Zero". He had no worries offending the art pontificating community; he was wealthier than all of them put together, and certain museums were dependent upon him, and not the other way around.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2012
- Messages
- 3,274
- Format
- 35mm RF
Kertesz is one of the golden triumvirate for me along with Weston and Gibson. Kertesz really started it all.
I had the pleasure of attending a talk he gave in September of 1975, when I was a student enrolled in the Photographic Arts Program at Ryerson Polytechnical Institute in Toronto.
His talk was as informative as it was stimulating. I remember that one member of the audience asked how to continue to photograph creatively if you don’t work as a photographer. His reply was, in paraphrase, to continue to photograph even if you have to work in another field. “Keep your photography pure” he said.
His talk was as informative as it was stimulating. I remember that one member of the audience asked how to continue to photograph creatively if you don’t work as a photographer. His reply was, in paraphrase, to continue to photograph even if you have to work in another field. “Keep your photography pure” he said.
Lucky you! André Kertész is one of my favourite photographers. Nothing but pure admiration of him. Did you also have Dave Heath as a teacher at Ryerson?
Lucky you! André Kertész is one of my favourite photographers. Nothing but pure admiration of him. Did you also have Dave Heath as a teacher at Ryerson?
I never had him as an instructor.
However, in the Spring of 1973, when I first applied to RPI, I completed the preliminary test they sent to all applicants, and was interviewed by Dave Heath.
One of the works I brought to show him was a synchro-slide presentation I had co-authored the year before. I didn’t know, at the time, of the similar (?!?) works he had himself produced. If I had, I probably wouldn’t have had the guts to show him my amateur effort!
Years later, in 2018, when I was a photographer at the National Gallery of Canada, in Ottawa, I would be involved in the reproduction, for the purpose of exhibition, of one of his works. The reproduction was required, as the original was to valuable to actually be used for the exhibition it was part of.
Andrew O'Neill
Moderator
I always loved his work. I always gave my students a Kertesz-related project. I do own a print entitled, Kertesz's Hands, photographed by David Vestal. That is about as close I'll get to owning anything "kertesz related 
That's incredible, thanks for sharing this story!
P.S. What is a synchro-slide presentation?
A synchro-slide presentation is (sort of) like a motion picture, with the still images changing at programmed intervals and a sound track.
In my case they were 35mm slides made on High Speed Ektachrome film.
In my case they were 35mm slides made on High Speed Ektachrome film.
I have enjoyed this photograph for years. Thank you for posting.
The great difficulty in constructing any individual work of art, as well as in the gradual organization of an overall artistic oeuvre, lies in establishing a complex unity. That is, to have elements that converse, contradict, and at the same time complement each other, ultimately resulting in a cohesive whole. This is less planned than one might hope and less unpredictable than one might believe. It emerges and is simultaneously provoked.
In the photographs of André Kertész, everything seems accidental and effortless, yet upon closer inspection, they reveal a much more intricate foundation. This blend of unforced simplicity and intellectual pursuit lends his work intensity and intrigue.
Some claim that the number of various elements that can coexist in a photograph is directly proportional to its quality. A great misconception. The coexisting elements should be as few as possible to ensure the beauty of simplicity. Each additional element must underscore this simplicity rather than aim for complexity, so that the outcome is a unified point rather than a mere assemblage of parts.
I will venture a provocative (and relatively more mundane) comparison with famous alcoholic cocktails. I am sure drinking photographers will understand. The great and established cocktails (and it is by no means easy to invent new ones) usually rely on three components: the primary (typically stronger in alcohol and in smaller quantity), the auxiliary (usually non-alcoholic or lighter and in larger quantity), and the flavor and aroma enhancer (typically in drops or traces). Any other addition is risky as it might blur the drink's character and create conflicts that fail to result in a harmonious final product. What is even more fascinating is that in successful combinations, it is not evident which drink dominates — the primary or the auxiliary. The final taste should be that of the cocktail, not the individual ingredients.
In this particular photograph by Kertész, there is a very risky primary element: the emotionally charged and accentuated presence of the woman with her few modest flower pots, evoking a flood of archetypes and references. As if that weren't enough, the photographer places this scene at the center of the image, further highlighting its obvious significance.
But then comes the second element: the surrounding environment. The snapshot of the woman at the window did not require this baroque development of an entire fortress within the light well and rooftop. Its presence seems disproportionate, yet that is precisely its contribution. It balances, with its geometric perfection and formalistic arrogance, the emotional excess of the woman at the window, without erasing her. Thus, a creative dialogue is born between the obvious and unforced emotion and the aesthetic presence of form. It would be inconceivable to limit the photograph to its center under the pretext that the essence of the description lies there, just as it would be naive to erase the center in favor of a visual construction that would be exhausted at first glance. The two subjects — woman and wall — complement each other and converse, unified through the variations of gray that act as a visual enhancer. The viewer cannot hierarchize or detach the two seemingly disparate subjects but can only bow before the combination of boldness and simplicity of the great photographer.
Platon Rivellis, Newspaper "Kathimerini", July 2011
“Your talk," I said, "is surely the handiwork of wisdom because not one word of it do I understand.”
― Flann O'Brien, The Third Policeman
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |