B&W Reversal with Hydrogen Peroxide

[Fragomeni]

Have you tried reducing the bleach time? That could also help to increase Dmax, although you’ll need to find an optimal time where the highlights are clear.

That could be worth experimenting with but it would be a fine balance. I’m really only seeing the Dmax issue with Fomapan, which is a thin emulsion anyway so that’s probably just what it is. Dmax with FP4 is better (although could be better) and Tri-X is much better from the little I’ve experimented with it — need to try it again though yo confirm because I messed up the process a bit last time I tried and my overall exposure was insufficient.

——

Has anyone tried this with Ilford 3200? I’ve seen reference to it reversing decently and I know DR5 can do it with good results. I’m in need of a faster film for reversal for better hand held times with my 35mm Grandagon because it requires a 2.5 stop center graduated ND and that loss of two stops is largely relegating me to a tripod when I want to use it at f22 where it really sings.

 

[M-88]

I accidentally ended up having the necessary chemicals for this kind of reversal, so I thought I would give it a try, just out of curiosity. But I have a question:

Should the film be wet during the second exposure, or should I let it dry first? Re-spooling the wet film on the spiral, on the other hand, might be tricky.

 

[SalveSlog]

Wet, I'd say. And putting it back on the spool is easier if you do it under water.

 

[Anon Ymous]

Should the film be wet during the second exposure, or should I let it dry first? Re-spooling the wet film on the spiral, on the other hand, might be tricky.

Just leave the film on the spiral, no need to take it out and respool, but have it immersed in water during re-exposure. I spin it under the lamp I use, just an ordinary household one. It used to be a 75W tungsten one, nowadays it's an led equivalent. About a minute or so from each side should be enough. Actually, it's probably massive overexposure.

 

[M-88]

Just leave the film on the spiral, no need to take it out and respool, but have it immersed in water during re-exposure. I spin it under the lamp I use, just an ordinary household one. It used to be a 75W tungsten one, nowadays it's an led equivalent. About a minute or so from each side should be enough. Actually, it's probably massive overexposure.

I probably sound dumb, but I always thought "expose from both sides" meant removing the film from the spiral and exposing its entire length from both sides

 

[Donald Qualls]

I've done it on the spiral, and it works fine. All that's needed is to get enough light to all of the undeveloped halide to fully expose it. One trick I've read (but haven't tried) for plastic spirals is to fill a stainless salad bowl with water, drop the reel into it, and expose with a moving reflector lamp. One minute or so, then flip the spiral over and another minute on the other side.

 

[M-88]

I've done it on the spiral, and it works fine. All that's needed is to get enough light to all of the undeveloped halide to fully expose it. One trick I've read (but haven't tried) for plastic spirals is to fill a stainless salad bowl with water, drop the reel into it, and expose with a moving reflector lamp. One minute or so, then flip the spiral over and another minute on the other side.

Thank you, I have a plastic spiral that has a transparent upper part - might be convenient for better exposure. I also have a roll of Rollei Infrared which turned out to be underwhelming in its near infrared role, so that's what I'm going to use.

 

[relistan]

I (carefully) unspool it from the stainless reel and hold it up to the light on both sides, then spool it back on. This is impossible with plastic reels, it won’t load wet. I’ve never scratched it doing this, but if you get good results without it, that’s safer.

 

[YoIaMoNwater]

I probably sound dumb, but I always thought "expose from both sides" meant removing the film from the spiral and exposing its entire length from both sides

I use this bowl method where you don't have to remove the film from the reel and works perfectly.

 

[M-88]

I use this bowl method where you don't have to remove the film from the reel and works perfectly.

Oooof! If that's you talking in the video, then props to you for using a Zenit! Mine resides somewhere in one of my drawers.

Back on the subject, though: peroxide bleach didn't work for me. It didn't bleach the negatives completely so I ended up with a mess. I should really try finding a higher concentrate, or just go with EDTA.

 

[relistan]

Oooof! If that's you talking in the video, then props to you for using a Zenit! Mine resides somewhere in one of my drawers.

Back on the subject, though: peroxide bleach didn't work for me. It didn't bleach the negatives completely so I ended up with a mess. I should really try finding a higher concentrate, or just go with EDTA.

It takes a fair bit of testing with any kind of reversal process to get it right. The bleach might not be the problem. That said, the peroxide/EDTA/citric acid bleach is much better.

 

[Donald Qualls]

or just go with EDTA.

EDTA won't work for B&W reversal. It converts the developed silver to a fixable form, but doesn't dissolve it away, and you'll get solid black film after light (or chemical) fogging and second development.

 

[relistan]

EDTA won't work for B&W reversal. It converts the developed silver to a fixable form, but doesn't dissolve it away, and you'll get solid black film after light (or chemical) fogging and second development.

Donald you can’t use it by itself. You use it with citric acid and peroxide, per the long thread I ran about it a few years ago and the posted formula here on the site and on my blog. There are of course other bleaches that have used it.