Thanks @Niglyn.
My DEV values don't seem to match your description (5.6ms S1 vs 4.1ms M is 1.5ms difference or +0.45EV). I'll check the manual when it comes out.
I think the labels S1/M/S2 would be better. L/R can be confusing if you turn the tester 180 degrees, or for vertical shutters.
I understand that because the curtains are accelerating, the slit naturally widens from start to finish. However the total travel time should be the same (like two apples falling from the same height) and exposure time should also be the same (larger slit but faster = smaller slit but slower). It seems the 1st curtain in my camera is accelerating more between M-S2, hence the shorter exposure on S2.
Maybe it's not overly significant. Here's the output for 1/30.
My DEV values don't seem to match your description (5.6ms S1 vs 4.1ms M is 1.5ms difference or +0.45EV). I'll check the manual when it comes out.
I think the labels S1/M/S2 would be better. L/R can be confusing if you turn the tester 180 degrees, or for vertical shutters.
I understand that because the curtains are accelerating, the slit naturally widens from start to finish. However the total travel time should be the same (like two apples falling from the same height) and exposure time should also be the same (larger slit but faster = smaller slit but slower). It seems the 1st curtain in my camera is accelerating more between M-S2, hence the shorter exposure on S2.
Maybe it's not overly significant. Here's the output for 1/30.