Thanks. Don't think I ever heard of it.
I am still puzzled...
I checked out my archive and looked through all the catalogs and stuff, and in the early 90's a sensitivity of EV-4 by far was extreme.
But I also found one dubblesided photocopy out of some magazin or catalog, I dated as 1993. And it contains (without importer or manufacturer stated) an ad for Calcu flashes.
For the models Flash S, Flash II, Light X and Light XP.
The title says "Digital Precision for an utmost advantageous Price"
There are hints at metering in the dark, but no wording of any kind that I would expect for a meter that is by one magnitude more sensitive than even the two or three most extremely sensitive competitors.
That likely was the reason that I read what was given at the small-letters section not as sensitivity but as min. value on scale, as an error of the translator.
I filed that Calcu photocopy at the far back of my light meter register where the obscure or no-name ones sit. And funny enough just the next filed item is a page out of the catalog of a german dealer/importer of obscure stuff who got the sensitivity of the Polaris meter wrong by 5 stops!
Just the usual error concerning what I explained above.
Thus can you confirm that the Calcu Light XP actually is that much more sensitive as stated?
(Best tested against competitors.)
The Minolta Auto Meter II goes down to -4 EV -- but there is the plug-in BOOSTER & BOOSTER II that take it a LOT lower, -10, maybe???
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |