Color cast problem with DIY color negative chemistry

OP
OP
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Messages
24
Location
Puerto Rico
Format
35mm
That, and chuck NLP out of the window.

Do you think that NLP is in general an inaccurate conversion tool? I have had some weird experiences that left me confused over the years but it's effective for streamlining the whole process. I get MOSTLY consistent results, and after probably 20,000 conversions I've certainly put it through its paces.

Most seem to agree that NLP is the best conversion software. Overall I've been satisfied. I have yet to try the new Smartconvert program but seems like it has less tools.

What is your workflow?
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,511
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Do you think that NLP is in general an inaccurate conversion tool?

Inaccurate: yes, very much so. But accuracy is in general not necessarily the best criterion for usefulness. So by all means, use it. But when it comes to trying to figure out how different test negatives relate to each other in a more objective way, NLP is a liability and should be avoided.

What is your workflow?

To each their own, though.

Please note that my comment about ditching NLP is really limited to the technical troubleshooting of negatives. I imagine it works well for getting pleasing images in your normal workflow.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Messages
24
Location
Puerto Rico
Format
35mm
Each layer of this discussion seems to uncover further points of inaccuracy in my process. Thanks for helping me hone it in. I'm working towards getting everything as accurate as possible while maintaining speed and efficiency.

I just took a brief look at your video and wow yes I do see how that workflow is likely much more accurate than the automatic conversion via NLP. I will give it a shot one of these days. I have never used GIMP so there will be a learning curve.

I've been playing a bit with those test images. Sometimes NLP needs some coaxing to get it where it needs to go. It's certainly an estimation rather than a 1:1 representation. The bleach bypass looks much cleaner and I don't know why. I'm seeing a lot of digital (?) noise in the regular dev conversion.

One thing at a time, though.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,511
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
The bleach bypass looks much cleaner and I don't know why. I'm seeing a lot of digital (?) noise in the regular dev conversion.

Rescan and invert manually as I've shown; I think things will become a little easier to interpret at that point. The images may not be as pleasing as the NLP-converted ones you've got so far, but it'll help you better understand the differences, and ultimately the processing problems you're running into - which still puzzle me, btw.
 

lamerko

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Messages
709
Location
Bulgaria
Format
Multi Format
I have a really smeared film during processing - I never understood how it happened. Strange blue casts and... noise. No retained silver.
What you think of as digital noise may not be digital noise at all - it is likely to be artifacts of the film itself. Set the camera to ISO 100 - the slightly longer shutter speeds of this camera will not reproduce visible noise. Also, in the new versions of Lightroom and Photoshop there is an integrated algorithm for cleaning noise before RAW conversion - this has nothing to do with smearing artifacts - a very powerful tool. However, it will only work on the actual digital noise, not on the captured artifacts from the film itself.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Messages
24
Location
Puerto Rico
Format
35mm
Occam's razor - the simplest solution is usually the correct one.

After developing 18 rolls yesterday (12 c-41, 6 ECN-2) I can conclude that the issue with developer/bleach crossover causing staining to be entirely resolved. At least as far as I can perceive it.

The culprit? Probably just insufficient washing. The only variable I changed yesterday was to add a 5th wash cycle after developer/bleach and up the stop bath to 250ml 5% white vinegar/750 water (1.25%).

There may have been a chemical issue also at play here, but I think that the most simple answer is likely the correct one.

Just wash more!!!

I also ignored the sodium sulfite clearing bath post bleach. Using 40g of SS each dev seemed like overkill. Additionally, I should mention a liter of TF-5 cleared 18 rolls of CN satisfactorily @6min fix.

Now I can focus on the other (various!) inaccuracies and undesirable imperfections in my processing. Thanks for the help, this has all been very informative.
 

Attachments

  • ECN-2-1.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 16
  • C-41-1.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 15
OP
OP
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Messages
24
Location
Puerto Rico
Format
35mm
I still used 20g in the one-shot stop bath before the bleach. I thought someone said 20g/L in a clearing bath after bleach as well? Perhaps I misunderstood.

If I use a sulfuric acid stop (reusable) I can dump 20g of sodium sulfite in there and that will keep for a while?
 

lamerko

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2022
Messages
709
Location
Bulgaria
Format
Multi Format
For a long time I used ferricyanide bleach for ECN-2 films. My process was basically as described by Kodak - stop bath with sulfuric acid, no sulfite, BUT with a long wash after the stop bath. Since temperature control is not so important afterwards, I just took a short break during the wash. The same after the bleach - this is mainly to protect my fixer. For a while I tested an additional bath with sulfite to shorten the time for intermediate washes - it worked perfectly with 20g/liter. Eventually, I found a supplier of C-41 bleach for minilabs - I now use only it and my process is much faster.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Messages
24
Location
Puerto Rico
Format
35mm
You'll get a potentially dangerous amount of sulfur dioxide gas. If not dangerous, it'll at least be very uncomfortable and it won't achieve what you're looking for.
Good to know! I will not try that then.


How long of a wash?

After transitioning to this new workflow I'm only managing one dev cycle an hour including spooling and hanging. If I mix 1500ml of chemicals that's 5 rolls in my big Paterson tank, but 5 rolls require even more wash time. Probably 1/3 of developing time is now spent washing, and that could be mostly eliminated by using standard c-41 bleach. I'm working on that, but as I mentioned sourcing those chemicals in powder form and in reasonable quantities is still on the to-do. I can order kilograms of PDTA from India but that would only make sense for me if I was going to mix bulk quantities of bleach to potentially distribute to other photographers in the community here. That's all a ways off.

At least ferri bleach has the upshot of 3~ minute soup time and long usable lifespan. I have considered collecting/filtering rainwater to reduce my water usage now that all this additional washing is required...it's about 4 gallons per cycle.
 

yonsama

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2022
Messages
8
Location
korea
Format
35mm

제품의 유통기한을 확인하세요.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…