Designing a new affordable production-ready Autocollimator

totocalcio

A
totocalcio

  • 3
  • 0
  • 62
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 5
  • 2
  • 120
Jerome Leaves

H
Jerome Leaves

  • 3
  • 0
  • 74
Jerome

H
Jerome

  • 2
  • 0
  • 77
Sedona Tree

H
Sedona Tree

  • 1
  • 0
  • 85

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,443
Messages
2,759,089
Members
99,500
Latest member
Opa65
Recent bookmarks
0

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
623
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
I believe it would have to be on the star itself. But honestly it's mostly for a rough estimate.

Screenshot 2024-12-12 152543.png
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,483
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I believe it would have to be on the star itself. But honestly it's mostly for a rough estimate.

View attachment 385325

Yes, and my star has no marks so I estimate, inner, middle and outer. It is actually pretty nice to instantly check a lens to see how much it deteriorates in the corners. . Most lenses I have tried allow viewing the far corners but wide open only. Though, the wide open performance in the corners is usually what is of interest (to me at least).
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
I had some bad lenses, finally got my hands on a good one direct from a manufacturer on Alibaba. I'll be able to source more when the time comes.

Siemens star off a mirror (I put some sharpie marks on it so I had a sense of how much of it was actually visible through the eyepiece)

2024-12-21 20.43.31 (Large).jpg


Off film through a 50mm f2 lens on a K1000

2024-12-21 20.39.30 (Large).jpg


The assembly so far. I made a melamine base, 1/2" thick with some more pieces screwed to the bottom. 25mm carbon fibre column, aluminum flange to join the two. 10mm carbon fibre rods to join the column clamp to the autocollimator itself. I'm very happy with this base build, it works really nicely. I think I'll be offering the AC with and without the base as a copy stand or even a tripod will work in it's place if you're more budget conscious or have something good already in your possession.

Aluminum body is working well, lens barrel seems to work well, but doesn't hold concentricity when being rotated. It returns to "zero" when rotated back into the same angle it was when you started. Working on a green LED lamp still, with and off the shelf USB powered constant current controller.

2024-12-21 21.23.52 (Large).jpg


More soon. I've designed a jig to do wear testing on the lens barrel thread to see how the MJF printed threads hold up to tens of thousands of actuations. I have some new prints on the way with alterations I've made based on how things looked and felt with this first build.
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
Latest prototype state. Working really well, just a few tweaks and improvements left.

2025-01-16 15.24.33 (Large).jpg
2025-01-16 17.11.01 (Large).jpg
2025-01-02 13.26.46 (Large).jpg
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,483
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I don't know if you are going to incorporate it or not, but what I miss on my Pearl collimator (that the next model actually has) is the ability to read the focus scale in feet or meters right off the collimator barrel. I have to calculate the values with a table, but the other Pearl is engraved on the barrel.

This feature comes if very handy when making focus scales for home-made cameras.
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
I don't know if you are going to incorporate it or not, but what I miss on my Pearl collimator (that the next model actually has) is the ability to read the focus scale in feet or meters right off the collimator barrel. I have to calculate the values with a table, but the other Pearl is engraved on the barrel.

This feature comes if very handy when making focus scales for home-made cameras.

Mine is a multi-turn barrel, I think it wouldn't be possible to do this way. Did the Pearl only turn one part of a revolution?
 

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
623
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
Looking good! What's the focal length @Reveni-matt ?

Honestly, the focus scale functionality is not that useful or accurate. With a collimating lens of 200mm, the lens would need to retract ~40mm to get a virtual target at 1m. And you then need to know with good accuracy the distance between the film plane of the camera and the principal plane of the collimating lens.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,483
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Mine is a multi-turn barrel, I think it wouldn't be possible to do this way. Did the Pearl only turn one part of a revolution?

Actually, I think every suggestion I have has been with respect to features the Pearl 6800 has that my 6400 does NOT have.

I know you are pretty far along with your design, but have you seen the Camera Craftsman May-June 1978? They have a good technical article about the Pearl 6800 and its advanced features. With your muilti-turn barrel, I actually thought you were copying the Pearl C6800 already. I don't have a good picture but you can see here how they put the feet/meter numbers along side the millimeter scale vertically.

Depending on how you have done your millimeter scale, it is just a matter of doing the calculations and having the feet/meter numbers printed next to the millimeter scale.

BTW, the 6400 has a focus stage that is straight out of a microscope focus mechanism. The problem with that is that it has to be pretty stiff, otherwise it drops down with gravity. I think that is why the rotating barrel that you are doing is a better solution.
jpeg.jpg

Screen Shot 2025-01-20 at 5.28.23 PM.png
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
Looking good! What's the focal length @Reveni-matt ?

Honestly, the focus scale functionality is not that useful or accurate. With a collimating lens of 200mm, the lens would need to retract ~40mm to get a virtual target at 1m. And you then need to know with good accuracy the distance between the film plane of the camera and the principal plane of the collimating lens.

243mm. Needing that much travel to reach 1m isn't great.

I wouldn't know how to find the principle plane of the lens I'm using. That's not great.

If I eliminated the objective focusing I could cut probably close to 20% off the price.
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
Actually, I think every suggestion I have has been with respect to features the Pearl 6800 has that my 6400 does NOT have.

I know you are pretty far along with your design, but have you seen the Camera Craftsman May-June 1978? They have a good technical article about the Pearl 6800 and its advanced features. With your muilti-turn barrel, I actually thought you were copying the Pearl C6800 already. I don't have a good picture but you can see here how they put the feet/meter numbers along side the millimeter scale vertically.

Depending on how you have done your millimeter scale, it is just a matter of doing the calculations and having the feet/meter numbers printed next to the millimeter scale.

BTW, the 6400 has a focus stage that is straight out of a microscope focus mechanism. The problem with that is that it has to be pretty stiff, otherwise it drops down with gravity. I think that is why the rotating barrel that you are doing is a better solution.
I did read this a while back. I was looking at Gokosha units mostly. Having the multi turn barrel gives a lot more control vs a rack and pinion microscope style (and easier to make) but it seems the required precision isn't very necessary. If the Pearl does it by rack and pinion, then it's suitably accurate.

Starting to consider removing the focus mount to lower costs and decrease complexity given it's not sounding super useful for most people.
 

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
623
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
On the other hand, a focusing lens is pretty useful for calibrating the collimator. And if you fall on a maladjusted (testing) lens that stops a bit before true infinity, you can easily confirm that by retracting the collimator lens a little. So maybe a short 10mm throw could be useful?
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
On the other hand, a focusing lens is pretty useful for calibrating the collimator. And if you fall on a maladjusted (testing) lens that stops a bit before true infinity, you can easily confirm that by retracting the collimator lens a little. So maybe a short 10mm throw could be useful?

The target and eyepiece are threaded for calibration so it's not strictly required to have a movable objective as well.

Wouldn't you know it's maladjusted because you can't reach infinity? If it was going beyond infinity you'd see it pass through focus first.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,483
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I see your point about removing the ability to focus, otherwise your device may need to cost more than a used Gokosha or Pearl.

However, sometimes the autocollimator focus is needed. For example racking the test camera lens all the way back to infinity clears up the Siemens target, but is it as sharp as it will get? Will it get sharper if the focus of the test camera could be racked farther back?? Hard to know. At least with a focusing autocollimator you can zero in on the sharpest image of the target, then check to see if the autocollimator still reads zero.
 

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
623
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
Yes there's a range where the reticle appears decently sharp. But when the lens stops, you can't tell if it could have gotten a *bit* sharper.
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
Well there you go, you guys sold me on keeping it.

It's going to be cheaper than the typical going rate for a unit online. Not to mention how scarce they are.
 

Andreas Thaler

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Messages
4,313
Location
Vienna/Austria
Format
35mm
It would be important to include detailed instructions for use with the collimator, because this device is not self-explanatory. Also information, what can be done with it.

This is beneficial for interested parties who have no experience with it and thus increases the potential customer base.
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
It would be important to include detailed instructions for use with the collimator, because this device is not self-explanatory. Also information, what can be done with it.

This is beneficial for interested parties who have no experience with it and thus increases the potential customer base.

Of course. I myself barely understand how to use it. Still exploring what it's capable of as well.
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
BTW @Reveni-matt how's the stiffness of the stand? At high magnifications, tiny vibrations will be apparent.

The magnification is not that high, the siemens star projection is around 3mm across on the film plane with a 50mm lens. There are vibrations if you touch it of course, it settles quickly and touching the base plate does not have much of an effect. I don't have any issues using it. The carbon fibre rods are very stiff and do a good job of damping as well.
 

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
623
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
@Reveni-matt you should try to test it with a slow & short lens. My DIY autocollimator (f=333mm) is super dim (on film) at ~45mm f/5.6. I adapted it to use a P67 200mm f/4 lens and it gets better.
 
OP
OP

Reveni-matt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
47
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
Here's a 20mm f4 lens at f8, off a mirror:

2025-01-21 12.56.27 (Large).jpg


Here's off film at f4:
2025-01-21 13.05.55 (Large).jpg



The green LED is running at 500mA, probably putting out 1.5W.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom