Epson v300 still good for 35mm negatives?

Finn Slough Fishing Net

A
Finn Slough Fishing Net

  • 0
  • 0
  • 25
Dried roses

A
Dried roses

  • 6
  • 2
  • 65
Hot Rod

A
Hot Rod

  • 3
  • 0
  • 74
Relics

A
Relics

  • 2
  • 0
  • 63
The Long Walk

A
The Long Walk

  • 3
  • 0
  • 78

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,454
Messages
2,759,210
Members
99,506
Latest member
ryingg
Recent bookmarks
0

Iodosan

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
86
Location
Italy
Format
35mm
Goodmorning everyone. Since the labs scan me at 2400 dpi and give me the jpeg file and not the tiff file, I wanted to know if the v300 is still capable of giving good results at 2400 dpi. Thank you
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,250
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

petrk

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Messages
119
Location
Prague
Format
Multi Format
The 2400 DPI from Epson V300 will probably never be as good as the scan from the lab of the same DPI, resolution wise. V300 scans will be good in 1200 DPI; 2400 ads no recognisable improvement. Saying this, I scan in 2400 DPI nevertheless, knowing this limitation, because V300 allows me set individual setting, for example no sharpening, adjusting the levels etc. I found it better for post editing.
 

moggi1964

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
266
Location
Rossendale, UK
Format
Hybrid
I use an Epson 3200 Perfection scanner which supposedly scans to, yep, 3200 DPI. I see no difference between 1600 and 3200 so I'll usually scan at 1600. I use Vuescan for control of all the scanning parameters and am happy with the output.

If I come across an image that I really want to do something with, like print large for example, then I'll just have a lab scan it on one of their high end machines. That didn't happen in 2020 but there's hope for 2021 :cool:

Take a look here for information on tested scanners.
 
OP
OP

Iodosan

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
86
Location
Italy
Format
35mm
I use an Epson 3200 Perfection scanner which supposedly scans to, yep, 3200 DPI. I see no difference between 1600 and 3200 so I'll usually scan at 1600. I use Vuescan for control of all the scanning parameters and am happy with the output.

If I come across an image that I really want to do something with, like print large for example, then I'll just have a lab scan it on one of their high end machines. That didn't happen in 2020 but there's hope for 2021 :cool:

Take a look here for information on tested scanners.
This is exactly what I wanna do. Develop the roll and scan with v300 for sharing/archive. If I will find a great great quality shot I will go to the lab for scan or Print the photo from the negative. Thanks all for the replies
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom