John Wiegerink
Member
Thanks AndyI think it's PL, as it's a sheet film...

Thanks AndyI think it's PL, as it's a sheet film...
Amazing and I believe I even know the location; I shot there myself. A stream in Wales.
Efke 25 was awesome. Loved it in 8x10. Luckily I have a 50 sheet box of 4x5 that braxus sold me. That's a "special occasion" film.![]()
Ian, that's Efke 25 tonality for sure. I always just rated it at ISO 25. If I watched my development times right I never had problems with the high values going over the edge. When I first started using Efke 25 it was developed in ID-11 Plus. What I have left is now done in XT-3R, but when I do some more sheets with my Kodak Medalist and sheet film back I will try Pyrocat-HDC. I think it should be really nice in Pyrocat.I still have 2 boxes of 10x8 EFKE PL 25, it's a lovely 50 ISO film. I have some 5x4 as well, not sure how many sheets are left though.
View attachment 393227
This is a 5x4 shot on PL25, processed in either Rodinal or replenished Xtol.
Kb for 35mm, R for 120, and PL for sheet film. And the 25 is the Tungsten speed, not the daylight speed which was 50.
Ian
Ian, that's Efke 25 tonality for sure. I always just rated it at ISO 25. If I watched my development times right I never had problems with the high values going over the edge. When I first started using Efke 25 it was developed in ID-11 Plus. What I have left is now done in XT-3R, but when I do some more sheets with my Kodak Medalist and sheet film back I will try Pyrocat-HDC. I think it should be really nice in Pyrocat.
I wondered about Elke's speed ratings and never knew what you just posted. I did learn that my 6X9 Efke sheet film didn't like my tray processing the hard way. I tried to develop 5 sheets in a 5X7 tray and it was scratch city on three of those sheets. Dug out the FR adjustable tank and had no problems, but you still had to be careful. Maybe it was just my bad luck with scratching and other folks might have gotten by just fine. I just counted my sheets left and I have 14. Sad day when those are gone, but I'll live.I first used EFKE Kb 14 (the old DIN name) in 35mm back around 1978 shortly after it was imported into the UK, the claim was LF quality from 35mm negatives. Back then there was almost no emulsion hardening and I added either a hardening stop-bath or some formaldehyde to the developer, yes it was exceptionally fine grain, but too finicky. Later Fotokemica improved the hardening quite significantly.
View attachment 393243
Because Adox, and later EFKE Fotokemica, used the DIN method for speed testing there was no revision (doubling) of the film speed, unlike the ASA/BS standard changes of the early 1960s.
Ian
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |