LabBox

Super Slide

A
Super Slide

  • 1
  • 2
  • 70
Double Casino

A
Double Casino

  • 1
  • 0
  • 51
Holy Pool

A
Holy Pool

  • 2
  • 2
  • 93
Ugliness

Ugliness

  • 1
  • 3
  • 130
Passing....

A
Passing....

  • 6
  • 4
  • 126

Forum statistics

Threads
197,335
Messages
2,757,664
Members
99,463
Latest member
Dmitry K
Recent bookmarks
1
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,545
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
after several trials and a bit of frustration, 'm happy to report that I successfully developed my first 35mm film in the Labbox, loaded and processed the film in daylight; the result is excellent.the film is evenly processed. I learned that all one needs to do is follow the precisely and it works just fine. Now on to 120 film...
 

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,801
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format
After reading the article, it seems to me, a 'D' cell battery powered bbq spit motor in a stand, at the correct hight, with good connection to the tank knob would take over the agitation task, easily.

These funnels should include one that fits well and a bottom board for motor and tank should hold both together to prevent slipping apart misadventures.

Cheers and Godspeed to all,
Eli

https://www.google.com/aclk?sa=L&ai...t=&hvlocphy=9009983&hvtargid=pla-799797292486

Agfa used to make a similar tank: https://emulsive.org/articles/revie...ht-film-processing-tank-the-agfa-rondinax-35u I think Leica sold a rebranded version. It's been out of production for a long time.
 

Auer

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Messages
930
Location
sixfourfive
Format
Hybrid
after several trials and a bit of frustration, 'm happy to report that I successfully developed my first 35mm film in the Labbox, loaded and processed the film in daylight; the result is excellent.the film is evenly processed. I learned that all one needs to do is follow the precisely and it works just fine. Now on to 120 film...

Very cool.
 
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,545
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Jobo stopped production of the 2400 daylight tank a number of years back. Secondary sellers are asking ridiculous prices for them. The LabBox offers more and being closer in design to a Rodinax, easier to use. Get the crank for the LabBox, when I had a Rodinax, constantly turning the knob was annoying.
Actually that was one of my mistakes; the crank seems more convenient but the knob more securely feeds the film into the real properly. The knob the way to go for feeding in the film into the reel; the crank is more convenient for agitation.
 

snusmumriken

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,333
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm
Ralph, I really admire your determination. I can't help wondering if the Paterson System isn't still viable for you in a darkroom? If you could first clamp both sides of the reel in a vertical plane you could lift the film end into the ball-bearing dogs. Then you'd need to somehow clamp just one half of the spiral while you work the other half - the dogs will draw the film in without the use of the other hand. You need another pair of hands to help to construct a simple jig, but I do feel it could be made to work.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Jobo stopped production of the 2400 daylight tank a number of years back. The LabBox offers more and being closer in design to a Rodinax, easier to use.

Is the LabBox/Rondinax easier to use than the Jobo daylight-loading tank?
This Jobo tank in any case offers inversion processing in the same way as its dark-loading counterparts. Thus established processing-procedures and -times can be taken over one to one.
 
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,545
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Ralph, I really admire your determination. I can't help wondering if the Paterson System isn't still viable for you in a darkroom? If you could first clamp both sides of the reel in a vertical plane you could lift the film end into the ball-bearing dogs. Then you'd need to somehow clamp just one half of the spiral while you work the other half - the dogs will draw the film in without the use of the other hand. You need another pair of hands to help to construct a simple jig, but I do feel it could be made to work.

The Labbox works well for me for 35mm film. I will also try to make it work for 120 but, that seems to be a lot trickier than 35 mm. 4 x 5 sheet films I will continue to develop trays. Nothing is going to keep me another joke room. Nothing beats the smell of fixer in the morning.
 

Auer

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2020
Messages
930
Location
sixfourfive
Format
Hybrid
It's been mentioned a lot, but the LB really works well if attention is given to the manual of operations.

It's a practical design imo that delivers on it's promises.
 

Randy Stewart

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
277
Format
Medium Format
I'm just gonna leave this here, without pointing at anyone specific.

If one follows every step in the manual to the letter, one will have no trouble with NON-PET films.

Every bit of trouble I had for the first 2-3 rolls I did, was basically me not paying attention.

The LB is dead simple and because of that somewhat deceptive if one is not a manual reading kinda guy.

If in doubt, sacrifice a few rolls and load with the lid off. It becomes pretty obvious if one is not doing something right.

A small comment on following the manual directions. The original manual which issued with the Kickstarter delivered LB units was a total disaster - language unclear, diagrams unclear and not correctly associated with related text. However, I had occasion to review the current version of the manual available on line. It is clear that the manual was completely rewritten and all new diagrams replaced.. It is now quite clear and accurate. I think what happened was (1) the original was written in Italian, then translated to English by someone who was less than competent, and (2) the original was written well before they delivered the first units, and there were a number of serious changes to the reels, their assembly assembly, and operation after the manual was written.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,833
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I think what happened was (1) the original was written in Italian, then translated to English by someone who was less than competent, and (2) the original was written well before they delivered the first units, and there were a number of serious changes to the reels, their assembly assembly, and operation after the manual was written.

This makes me think of one bit in Robert Pirsig's book "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" where the narrator - a technical writer by trade - talks about the process that he would often go through to familiarize himself with a product before writing a manual for it.
In essence, the people that hired him often would pull the least valuable employee from what he was doing to help the writer do the manual 😅
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,211
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
When writing instructions I tried to imagine explaining things to my Mother where it was imperative that she understand it.

So teaming a tech writer with some wet behind the ears engineer isn't all that bad of a strategy.
 
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,545
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Agfa introduced this idea of daylight-loading. They made 3 different models.

This idea has been taken over by Jobo, though with a tank that very much resembles their other modern-type tanks, in the 60's and made it into the 2000's.

I myself have repeatedly doubted the benefit of such tank for a experienced user. Unless maybe he is physically limited in loading a spiral.
That Ralph did not take that advanced Jobo version instead very much surprises me.

Ralph is physically limited in loading aspiral(no left hand). The Lab Box worked out great for me in 135. Have yet to try it for 120.
 

beemermark

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
844
Format
4x5 Format
The issue I had with mine was getting the reels on correctly. The molded in directional arrows are really difficult to see. Once I got that straighten out I had no problem processing 35mm film. I have separate 120 reels and sort of gave up on that. I'm still not sure if I have the 120 reels on correctly.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom