It had cine perforation, so it sounds plausible.
It had cine perforation, so it sounds plausible.... There was a story that it was a cine print film. Maybe in this old thread, above. v.s.
Thanks to you too pdeeh. I am a world away from my cache (in France) so cannot check the 2 cans I have but what Gerald says sounds about right. There was a story that it was a cine print film. Maybe in this old thread, above. v.s.
Cine films are usually not on a polyester base. In contrast with acetate films polyester ones do not tear and therefore can damage expensive equipment. In addition acetate film is easier to splice. With several solvents that film acts as its own glue. Polyester film must be spliced with a special tape since the polyester is not soluble in solvents. The tape splice can be seen when the film is projected.
Thanks to you too pdeeh. I am a world away from my cache (in France) so cannot check the 2 cans I have but what Gerald says sounds about right. There was a story that it was a cine print film. Maybe in this old thread, above. v.s.
Thanks for the reply, David. Those of us who were convinced by Simon Galley's 2012 response and the subsequent evidence will take this as the definitive position and it should be the end of the matter. However the "bee may not have left and indeed may never leave the bonnets" of those who are convinced that there is a form of conspiracy which seems to consist of "not lying while cleverly avoiding the whole truth"I have checked with the people in our company who know these things...
I can back up what Simon Galley said "way back when" earlier in this thread.
This product was not made by us as a whole or even in part eg. emulsion.
It is possible that the use of an Ilford Developer on the label and the name might have been attempt to associate it with us somehow or it might only be coincidence.
Regards,
David
Yeah you say that.those who are convinced that there is a form of conspiracy
I have checked with the people in our company who know these things...
I can back up what Simon Galley said "way back when" earlier in this thread.
This product was not made by us as a whole or even in part eg. emulsion.
It is possible that the use of an Ilford Developer on the label and the name might have been attempt to associate it with us somehow or it might only be coincidence.
Regards,
David
Have Ilford given licences to use the original PanF formulation ( modified ) to other companies in the past.
For example to manufacture copy film
on a very near PanF basis.
(We discused the differences from emulsion in concern of anti halation a.s.o. here adequately).
For example licences to the 2005 bunkrupt Agfa-Gevaert Leverkusen?
We all may have understanding if you are
not allowed to state because it could be
a classified issue.
OMG!!!!!
Frank
OMG!!!!!
Frank
I liked it, and it was a bargain, but it seems to have disappeared in bulk form; i think there was a thread this year which suggested that it had been the last frozen master roll of a no-longer manufactured product that was being sold off in bulk rolls. My memory might be faulty though,
if anyone really wants to try it there's a few short rolls - 7 or 12 metres - or 36-shot cassettes being sold on ebay at inflated prices
That reminds me about a series on TV in the mid 80s where the people looked like normal human beings but were in fact alien lizards, intent on conquering the world, who revealed themselves as such by picking up white mice by their tails and sliding them down their throats with relishYeah you say that.
But when you're woke to the truth of so-called "Simon r galley" (which by the way is an exact anagram of "I am Cthulhu") being in reality an intergalactic space lizard controlling the EU ... Well, need i say more?
Let's at first wait for a statement of Ilford/Harman.
Perhaps they should fly the flag more now.!
with regards
Yes that was it. ThanksI think it was "V"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_(1984_TV_series)
I believe it wuz RATS, and they didn't have any relish, or any pickles or coleslaw or ketchup. Raw rat.picking up white mice by their tails and sliding them down their throats with relish
Have Ilford given licences to use the original PanF formulation ( modified ) to other companies in the past.
For example to manufacture copy film on a very near PanF basis.
I'm not aware of us ever having done that, my earlier statement can be taken to exclude this as well.
- David
Sometimes things get missed when browsing but post #82 is that statement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?