Jeremy Mudd
Member
I guess I'm right down the middle on that one.
I think there is generally the right tool for the job, or maybe the "best" tool for the job. Then there are situations where the tool isn't the best, yet someone with skill is able to bridge the gap - with some acceptable compromises, possibly.
Then there are situations when the right tool is really needed.
I know this is analog-only, but a good example: I shoot a lot of wildlife photography - mostly birds. Its a very special niche that relies heavily on skill, knowledge, preparation, and equipment. I can excel at the first three parts of that equation, but if I don't have the fourth - a camera with high fps, fast/unlimited buffer, great autofocus coupled to a quality telephoto lens - I'm a lot less likely to get the shot. And if I brought the Holga to that gunfight - no way.
Jeremy
I think there is generally the right tool for the job, or maybe the "best" tool for the job. Then there are situations where the tool isn't the best, yet someone with skill is able to bridge the gap - with some acceptable compromises, possibly.
Then there are situations when the right tool is really needed.
I know this is analog-only, but a good example: I shoot a lot of wildlife photography - mostly birds. Its a very special niche that relies heavily on skill, knowledge, preparation, and equipment. I can excel at the first three parts of that equation, but if I don't have the fourth - a camera with high fps, fast/unlimited buffer, great autofocus coupled to a quality telephoto lens - I'm a lot less likely to get the shot. And if I brought the Holga to that gunfight - no way.

Jeremy