Presoaking film and development time

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,096
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

I have never had an airbell whether I rap the tank or use a Jobo processor and I always presoak. End of discussion.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,483
Format
35mm RF
Perhaps we should introduce a pre-soak before pre-soak. A bit like the fallacy of getting a closer shave with multiple blade razors.
 

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,118
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format

Rather than basing my presoaking on an assumption, I started doing it as an experiment and it worked for me. I don't know why it worked when I had faint airbells with Neopan400 in 120 size. Prior to using that film, I hadn't experienced an airbell for half a century. Now that Neopan is finished, I've moved to HP5+ in 120 size, I still do a presoak but I don't know if it's necessary. Maybe I'll try a roll without.
 

BobUK

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
491
Location
England, UK
Format
Medium Format
"A pre-rinse is not recommended as it can lead to uneven development."

This is the advice from Ilford on their data sheet for PanF+

Take a look at the second paragraph, last line, page three of the Ilford data sheet.


I have only skimmed through this topic here on Photrio so forgive me if it has already been pointed out before.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,528
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
Perhaps we should introduce a pre-soak before pre-soak...

Two sequential pre-soaks was the only way I was ever able to rid original Acros of airbells when developing it using inversion agitation in small tanks. Sheets in Jobo Expert drums on rotary processors didn't exhibit the problem.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,005
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
...

I have only skimmed through this topic here on Photrio so forgive me if it has already been pointed out before.
It gets mentioned everytime the subject comes up. Note that Ilford did not say pre-soaking causes uneven development, and that Ilford made a recomondation, not an 'rule'.
 

BobUK

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
491
Location
England, UK
Format
Medium Format
It gets mentioned everytime the subject comes up. Note that Ilford did not say pre-soaking causes uneven development, and that Ilford made a recomondation, not an 'rule'.
"It gets mentioned every time the subject comes up." and still no progress? Sounds like Groundhog Day to me.


True, Ilford does not say it will cause uneven development. But they do say "it can lead to uneven development."

Cheers Vaughn.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,005
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Definitely Groundhog Day material!!

All the stages of development can lead to uneven development -- if the moon is out-of-phase, a low is lollygagging through, someone sneezed on the stainless, or puts a surfactant in the developer.

That extra bit of Scotch will not magically turn that fixer I am pouring in the tank into Ilford developer.. Actually -- I acheived very even non-development if I remember rightly.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…