I would simply chalk that up to good ol colonial influence. Nothing more nothing less
That, combined with path dependency. But the same can be said for RHT!
I would simply chalk that up to good ol colonial influence. Nothing more nothing less
Probably I'm not representative, but I wouldn't buy much of 220 . When it was available decades ago, I would buy 220 for very specific situations. If I needed a lot of frames, like on sports or an event, I would use 35mm. 120 wasn't practical because the additional steps you needed. I needed to be more careful with focus since medium format has a shallower DOF for example.
I know for sure 220 was really useful for strictly controlled situations, like fashion or commercial products sessions (my father shooted food and other stuff for publicity and used 220 a lot), since subject tended to stay on one place and light was more controlled. For action photography 35mm was more practical. Today, I think digital fill that market.
I have rolled hundreds of 120 rolls but none 220 (even though I have about 10 cameras that can use it) because its not practical for me.
Like I said, probably not representative.
Looking at their current prices, 220 Aerocolor is a little less than double their 120 offering of the same(12.99 vs. 24.99). They are competitive with Catlabs, which is the other source of 120 Aerocolor I know of($12.90), and between the two I'd rather support Reflx.I think one of the big hurtles for 220 is that the sellers right now charge twice as much. Reflx Labs still gets a lot of flak for actually changing MORE for 220.
I would simply chalk that up to good ol colonial influence. Nothing more nothing less
In regards to this, 65mm perfs are located about 4mm from the edge of the film as opposed to 70mm type 2 which are 2mm from the edge. While cutting off 5mm on each side of 70mm will cause the perfs to leave a ragged edge, cutting 2mm off each side of 65mm leaves the perfs intact. Cutting off just one edge will leave a ragged edge as the perfs will be cut through. This also means 65mm is a royal pain to cut as it is much more finicky to pull through the slitter since the blades are so close to the edge.it also looks like they slit down bothsides to leave a "sawtooth" edge on both? My personal preference is to leave perfs completely intact on one side and cut the other smooth or mostly smooth, which I've done post-processing for scanning(never before rolling, especially since my cameras need the full 65mm...) but I know there are arguments for doing it different ways.
Getting to shoot 220 with my 6x9 is lovely change of speed with that format since I am typically very deliberate knowing I only have 8 frames. But it does makes sense that 220 would be very useful for professionals.
umm probably that would be ok. I use a lot of 6x9 on my Mamiya Press and Horseman. Since it is only 16 exp it may work. Will roll some 220 from Aviphot and see how I like it![]()
For some strange reason, left-handed drive seems to be frequented to islands. Great Britain, St. Thomas (US Virgin Islands), Japan
The left-handed road-driving British ran India and British Columbia was, well, British. Maybe that had something to do with it.Probably because islands don't have roads that connect to other countries, except when there are really big bridges.
Although I would suggest that India - the most populous country in the world - is certainly not an Island.
British Columbia was originally left hand drive, but visitors and truckers from the USA were incapable of dealing with change, so we switched.
Some cars are actually designed for easy switch during manufacturing, thus being suitable for both markets. The Toyota Yaris is/was an example.
For years the city of Victoria, BC had a major intersection that used a roundabout to control traffic flow. That was a remnant from the days when there was a huge British influence on the city. They took it out and replaced it with traffic lights, because US tourists driving RVs kept getting stuck in it!
Since then, roundabouts have become more common in many areas, so they are appearing again.
So much depends on what you are used to. Which in turn relates well to what us film photographers like to do.
The left-handed road-driving British ran India and British Columbia was, well, British. Maybe that had something to do with it.![]()
Iirc India only got its independence in the 40’s, I think. And BC was practically British until the late 1800s? Not so brushed up on Canadian history. Point is, US was independent for way longer than those 2.So was the USA - before it was the USA.
I wonder which side of the road the horse carts were on when what became the USA was still a colony?
Some cars are actually designed for easy switch during manufacturing, thus being suitable for both markets. The Toyota Yaris is/was an example.
Iirc India only got its independence in the 40’s, I think. And BC was practically British until the late 1800s? Not so brushed up on Canadian history. Point is, US was independent for way longer than those 2.
Also, FWIW, it seems like the US has driven on the right even before independence. We drove on the right back then because a lot of the US was agricultural, and large wagons used for farming were easier to drive on the right.
In regards to this, 65mm perfs are located about 4mm from the edge of the film as opposed to 70mm type 2 which are 2mm from the edge. While cutting off 5mm on each side of 70mm will cause the perfs to leave a ragged edge, cutting 2mm off each side of 65mm leaves the perfs intact. Cutting off just one edge will leave a ragged edge as the perfs will be cut through. This also means 65mm is a royal pain to cut as it is much more finicky to pull through the slitter since the blades are so close to the edge.
Edited to add an image.
RHD vehicles, driving on the left and passing oncoming traffic on the right comes from the practice of armed knights and samurai on horseback carrying their swords on the left of their belts, (a) to avoid clanging into each other's steel when passing in close proximity and (b) so right handers could attack each other with their dominant arms.
That's not the whole truth*, but it's the story I'm sticking to anyway, as it means RHDers are modern day warriors (sing it with me now, "on a steel horse I riiiiiide!") and the rest of the world, therefore, isn't...
With love from Australia... ;-)
(* A succinct rundown on the generally accepted truths if you're interested https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/...n-the-right-side-of-the-road-drive-flashback/)
Yet I doubt many people travelling the roads in old Britannia had swords. So it sounds like a convenient fabrication.
The fact is, when you need to choose one or the other and have no good reason for choosing either, you'll end up choosing one for no good reason. Once chosen, though, you need to stick with it.
If the internet had existed back then, I'm sure it would have been full of people who disagreed about the change.
Wow you got 1000 ft of 65mm film? Jelly…It's time to open a nice box of 1000ft 65mm film. But this film is much thicker than the standard 70mm Agfa or Kodak aerial film. I imagine that cutting will be much more difficult. How do you proceed? Do you cut each 120 film separately with the cutter, or do you cut long pieces and then make them 825mm? Which is more convenient?
And Sweden!Except in BC:
https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/history/british-columbia-right-side-driving-change-1922-3227966
If the internet had existed back then, I'm sure it would have been full of people who disagreed about the change.
For some strange reason, left-handed drive seems to be frequented to islands. Great Britain, St. Thomas (US Virgin Islands), Japan
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |