gainer
Subscriber
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2002
- Messages
- 3,703
I have been playing with concentration, but not in the conventional way. Make a solution of 9 grams ascorbic acid and 24 grams of borax in water to make a liter. Use this solution to dilute the original solution. Thus the concentration of phenidone is reduced while other ingredients remain the same. Thus far I have tried 0.8 (original), 0.4 and 0.2 grams of phenidone per liter. The time of development for FP4+ at 68 F is 8 minutes for the later one. Next I think I shall try waving a thimblefull of phenidone over the developing tank while developing in the ascorbate-borax solution. I already tried that solution without the magic act and got no measurable density.
My camera was set to bracket + and - 1/2 stop and I can see some difference in density but not in shadow detail or gradations. If I brag too much you will ignore me completely, as you should, so I must leave it to someone else to try the idea and report on it.
I know the fact the considerable dilution of the type I described has little effect on development time with agitation must put off those who use stand development. I have not tried it, but if I do it will be with a development time 1.5 times the agitated time. That time should give good results as far as average density is concerned, but I have no theory to predict the possibility of streaking or mottling that I reported in Photo Techniques some years ago when I tried it with Rodinal and Pyro.
I guarantee you will not have to divide the solution, and it will be good for at least 8 rolls per liter. That would be 8 8x10 inch films per liter, one at a time or interleaved. I hope if you try this, you will do it in such a way as not to break my bank if it fails.
My camera was set to bracket + and - 1/2 stop and I can see some difference in density but not in shadow detail or gradations. If I brag too much you will ignore me completely, as you should, so I must leave it to someone else to try the idea and report on it.
I know the fact the considerable dilution of the type I described has little effect on development time with agitation must put off those who use stand development. I have not tried it, but if I do it will be with a development time 1.5 times the agitated time. That time should give good results as far as average density is concerned, but I have no theory to predict the possibility of streaking or mottling that I reported in Photo Techniques some years ago when I tried it with Rodinal and Pyro.
I guarantee you will not have to divide the solution, and it will be good for at least 8 rolls per liter. That would be 8 8x10 inch films per liter, one at a time or interleaved. I hope if you try this, you will do it in such a way as not to break my bank if it fails.