- Joined
- Nov 16, 2004
- Messages
- 3,219
Didn't someone here do tests about HQMS? I think the HQ is Hydroquinone.... converted to HQMS? Don't remember clearly...
I think it's Potassium Hydroquinone Monosulfate. It is less active than Hydroquinone thus producing lower contrast. Not sure how it works in TDLC-102 in place of Glycin as the latter is even less active.
Developers aside, @Alan Johnson , that is a gorgeous photo!TDLC-102 with glycin does not seem to produce "onion rings" in the sky like I found using H&W Control with hydroquinone.
The developing time 30m 20C is conveniently reduced to 18m 25 C using Adox CMS20 II EI=25:
Adox CMS20 II was developed in TDLC-102 30m 20C, ag every 3 min.
Results were obtained with the scanner on auto except clipping of the black and white points was removed and a little sharpening added.
Adox HR-50 was exposed at EI=100 as my P&S camera defaulted to this.
It was also developed in TDLC-102 30m 20C, ag every 3min.
Both these films so developed gave negatives that looked as though they could be printed on silver gelatin paper.
I was lucky to get ideal conditions with sun and cloud, not too contrasty, easy to process.
Shot was on Adox CMS20 II at EI=20, Canon EOS 10, evaluative metering.
Phone pic of the negative is attached, it is actually less sepia than appears here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?