I spy an FX-3
No winder for that one, but the FX-3 2000 Super had the fake winder appendage (seen in the picture).
I spy an FX-3
It just seems obvious to me that if you need to shoot fast, and a lot, then digital is the way to go. I like to shoot film when I'm not in a hurry, and it's nice to make use of older cameras that are perfectly capable as they are. Adding a motor drive or winder is like putting lipstick on a pig, when all you're really interested in is the bacon.
Twenty five years ago it was a different story. Film was the way to go for everything, so having a winder or motor drive gave you capabilities that were not achievable in any other way.
Where are these rules you speak of?
All I see is questions and preferences.
Don’t cut yourself on the binder twine.
Earliest Rolleiflex winder, the Rolleimot (picture from the internet; I have never seen this in person). This picture omits the automatic cable release that screws into the camera's release button. This is essential for operation of the device.
View attachment 321101
O.K., I concede. My thoughts on the matter have been rapidly shot down, so my roll here has come to an end.
.... but it still amazes me how you guys are so easily wound up!![]()
[sarcasm] So have you been "edumucated"1 also, or ar you wound up?2 [/sarcasm] LOLI am really surprised at all the people using winders for whatever purpose.
While I’d never admonish anyone for using the above winders, I have a hard time seeing the use case and market for these.
They must have cost a pretty penny back in the day.
The Rolleimot can’t be much faster than winding yourself, and it’s twelve shots..‽
Even an intervalometer application seems kind of silly given the low frame count.
I know it was made in very low numbers. But who’d even get the idea? And who bought it?
Alpa has always been Leica like in its dedication to mechanics and the feel.
Who’d buy such an expensive SLR, only to strap it into a clunky harness, when it is clearly not designed for it?
Getting a Nikon F with motor drive was always a better option if you really need a motor, larger film back and intervalometer shooting.
[sarcasm] So have you been "edumucated"1 also, or ar you wound up?2 [/sarcasm] LOL
My suspicion is that the people posting in this thread that they use a winder are a self-selecting minority.
I used one for a while on my Mamiya 645 Super until I looked at the gear that the winder drove and saw how thin the gear really was and immediately went back to the hand crank methodI certainly do, on my Mamiya 645 Pro. You may have meant 35mm but didn't say that. The winder is really a "winder grip" and the camera handles much better with it.
I triggered this thread, and I'm sorry.
I put it down to advancing age, and the resultant deterioration of motor skills.
Please forgive me.
I triggered this thread, and I'm sorry.
I put it down to advancing age, and the resultant deterioration of motor skills.
Please forgive me.
Forgiveness not required. It was an interesting question and there were interesting responses. The only problem I noticed was when value judgements were attached to equipment choices.
Now I'm really embarrassed. I was only asking forgiveness for the obviously "bad" puns.![]()
I triggered this thread, and I'm sorry.
I put it down to advancing age, and the resultant deterioration of motor skills.
Please forgive me.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |