CD4-LC low contrast developer for scanning

JWMster

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
1,160
Location
Annapolis, MD
Format
Multi Format
Alan:

Thanks! I'm an inkjet printer ("Yes, one of THOSE!")... 'cause it's what I got and can be reasonably proficient with.
Curious where you've found microfilm... think I've seen it at the FPP perhaps, but seldom anywhere else (all 2 or 3 places these days!).
I love B&W... especially if I can get the subject into full tones and the rest in muted grays... a goal I've seen elsewhere that looks cool.
That said, I like a lot of work folks show here.... yours is great. And so I try to learn.... and even when I'm learning "not for me" or "not for my film / developer combo" it's all good. Thanks!
 

dokko

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2023
Messages
315
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
very interesting approach to tame the contrast (and some great photos I might add). thanks for sharing Alan!

Did you ever try your developer with Agfa Copex Rapid?

I use that film quite a lot, usually developed in Spur Dokuspeed SL-N, and while it generally works very well I find the highlights often a bit problematic. It's a rather expensive developer too, so it would be nice to have an alternative.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,771
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I developed a sheet of 8x10 HP5 in CD4-LC. The subject luminance range was quite wide, and normally I would have given the film N-1 in Xtol, or another conventional developer. I had to guess the time, as I've only thoroughly tested it with CMS 20 II. The negative is a bit on the thin side (DR of 1.00). I wanted to make a Kallitype print directly from it but since the DR was too low, I went the other route. Scanned in nicely and was able to make a very nice Kallitype!
 

dokko

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2023
Messages
315
Location
Berlin
Format
Medium Format
Alan Johnson said:
I have stuck with Adox CMS 20 II and Spur Ultra R 800 because IIRC they are both confectioned by Adox and I never had any problems with them.
IDK who puts the Copex Rapid into cassettes.
Click to expand...

the Agfa Copex Rapid indeed seems to be confectioned some what less reliably than Adox products. I also like Adox CMS 20 II but unfortunately it is not available anymore in 120
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,771
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Had the 8x10 set up on a suspension bridge, over the Pitt River. Shot some HP5 and developed it in CD4-LC. Guessed the time. Should have developed for longer as the negs came out a bit thin... Still scanned in nicely, and was able to make a Kallitype the hybrid way... I'm pretty confident that with a little tweaking of my development time, it will be a good developer to help control overly long subject luminance ranges...

 
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
Interesting to see your results with a "normal" contrast film HP5+ Andy, and a very nice pic too.
I daresay this low contrast developer may more closely match one of the "moderate contrast" Aviphot derivative films but did not get around to trying it yet.
 

JWMster

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
1,160
Location
Annapolis, MD
Format
Multi Format
Like the shot and the process. Thanks for sharing!
 
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
Seems like your development time and agitation could be used for a lot of the Rollei films in 120 ,Andy.

Here: List of repackaged Agfa Aviphot Pan 80 and 200 films and Kentmere 100 and 400 films

I just want to fulfill a wish by some forum members and a moderator: Here is the list of current repackaged (rebranded) Agfa Aviphot Pan 80 and 200 films and Kentmere 100 and 400 films: Agfa Aviphot Pan 80: Repackaged as Rollei Retro 80s and Rollei RPX 25. Agfa Aviphot Pan 200: Repackaged as...
www.photrio.com

Repackaged Aviphot 80 and 200 appear to be moderate high contrast films that CD4-LC tames to normal contrast if that is wanted.

Appreciate your interesting results.
 
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
A dull autumn day shot on the mid-high contrast Adox HR-50.
Focus appears to be on leaves in the center which show good sharpness and low grain.
The negative would likely print well on silver gelatin. Adox have their own recommendations for this.


It may be interesting to note that that the idea of using PPD derivatives to develop B/W film originates at least 25 years ago, see The Film Developing Cookbook 1998 p99.
Apart from Adox Atomal there seem to be no other such developers.
 

Corn_Zhou

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2023
Messages
77
Location
Shanghai, China
Format
Medium Format

Moersch Finol (In production) and Tetenal Emofin (currently out of production) both used CD-1 as the primary developing agent.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,532
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Corn_Zhou said:
Moersch Finol (In production) and Tetenal Emofin (currently out of production) both used CD-1 as the primary developing agent.
Click to expand...

In Finol it's one out of 3 developing agents together with catechol and pyrogallol, and they appear to be present in similar quantities. I'm not sure how they relate in terms of activity and whether this makes the CD1 the primary developing agent. It is an oddball developer for sure. It's good though; it worked wonders on Fomapan 100 for me. Very nice negatives.
 

Corn_Zhou

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2023
Messages
77
Location
Shanghai, China
Format
Medium Format

It is a very interesting developer indeed. According to the datasheet, solution B is a bufferred alkali (carbonate-bicarbonate) which brings its pH down to a point where catechol and pyrogallol is not that active compared to a straight carbonate alkali like the solution B for Pyrocat.
Also, may I ask about the starting point developing time for Foma films in Finol?
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,532
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Corn_Zhou said:
Also, may I ask about the starting point developing time for Foma films in Finol?
Click to expand...

I only used it on Fomapan 100 and I started out with something like 10 minutes at 1+1+100. In my memory this was slightly on the long side, but still a good starting point.
I once tried to ask Wolfang Moersch about this, but never received a reply.
 

Corn_Zhou

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2023
Messages
77
Location
Shanghai, China
Format
Medium Format
koraks said:
I only used it on Fomapan 100 and I started out with something like 10 minutes at 1+1+100. In my memory this was slightly on the long side, but still a good starting point.
I once tried to ask Wolfang Moersch about this, but never received a reply.
Click to expand...

Thanks!
 
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
Corn_Zhou said:
Moersch Finol (In production) and Tetenal Emofin (currently out of production) both used CD-1 as the primary developing agent.
Click to expand...

It is the high concentration of CD-4 that causes the contrast reduction [pic].
AFAIK CD-1 at high concentration has never been tried. It would be more toxic by many accounts.
 

Attachments

  • CD-4 contrast effect.jpg
    226.8 KB · Views: 62
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
I have found that while CD4-LC works well with microfilms , Aviphot derived films and the contrasty Ferrania P30, given a bit of help from contrast reduction in scanner software, like all developers that are re-used with increase in time, its use is a bit complicated. Also like other reuseable developers containing sulfite it tends to precipitate out finely divided silver and care is necessary to avoid this getting on the film, ie, decant the clear solution or filter out any precipitate.

So for the types of film mentioned I have found the one shot developer TDLC-102 devised by Bill Troop to be easier to use:

TDLC-102 developer (Bill Troop)

This one shot developer can give pictorial results with Adox CMS20 II or Spur Ultra R 800. It is detailed in The Film Developing Cookbook 1998 p97 and in FDC 2020 p132. In FDC 2020 p134 it is noted that HQMS might replace glycin. I made and use a 10x concentrate: Demin water 40C...
www.photrio.com

With a little contrast reduction in scanning the above films I have tested can be shot at box speed in TDLC-102. For silver gelatin printing, depending on the subject contrast range, they may benefit from a reduction in EI to below box speed ,where they give a somewhat less S-shaped curve.

In conventional developers a considerable reduction in EI may be required to give a pictorial result.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
Having found that TDLC-102 gave thinner negatives after about 1 month (using CMS20 II film) I made a test to compare it with CD4-LC 11.5 months old.
Both developers TDLC-102 concentrate and CD4-LC working solution were stored in glass bottles under inert gas.
The results (attachment) show that CD4-LC best meets the requirement of being long lasting.
 

Attachments

  • Microfilm Density.jpg
    227.8 KB · Views: 32
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
I returned to developing CMS20 II in CD4-LC after finding the 2-bath MeCD4 a bit like hard work and the TDLC-102 having a short shelf life.

The batch of CD4-LC used is now 12 months old, stored in a glass bottle under inert gas, and this is the 8th film developed in it, developed for 9 min x170% x 1.3 , agitated every 3 minutes.
That is a base time of 9 minutes 20C corrected with an increase of 70% for the 8th film, an additional x1.3 for agitation every 3 minutes and an additional correction for temperature:

Massive Dev Chart Film Development, Film Developing Database

www.digitaltruth.com

 
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
The later films I developed in this batch gave a bit thinner negatives using the times suggested in post 36 so I tried increasing the development time 10% for each film compared to the previous film.
This gives: N=1 9m, 2=9.9m,3=10.9m,4=12m,5=13m,6=14.5m,7=16m,8=17.5m,9=19.3m,10=21.2m all 20C, to be further multiplied by 1.3 for agitation every 3 minutes and corrected for temperature.
For my 9th film in this batch of CD4-LC this gave a better negative density than post 36 times.

 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,550
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

beautiful contrast in your images; worth exploring further.
 
OP
OP

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,219
I tried another high resolution high contrast film, Fuji Eterna RDS 4791, this may continue in production unlike CMS20 because of its use in archiving motion pictures.
A reasonable result was obtained at EI=6, 1/20 f4, but compared to CMS20 II at EI=20 there are more limitations at EI =6.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…