I have read from reliable sources that a wash aid (sodium sulphite mostly) enables much more effective washing in cold water*. Maybe you could carry a couple of 5L bottles of warm water to the darkroom and let the print go through such a bath for a while before taking it upstairs.
I use a Nova vertical slot print processor and I acquired a spare additional slot and I do just that: quick rinse after fix, then in the wash aid for a few minutes, then into the cold water washer.
I can find a source for that statement if you like.
You might want to look into an aquarium heater. They are inexpensive and you can adjust for a specific temperature.
Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent was hawked by Kodak in days of yore as the answer to cold water washing. Of course this was back in the 50's and 60's, way before Ilford's modern method.
I like Matt's suggestion.
I also doubt that the water temperature of 12 degrees will not do the job sufficiently.
I would think 53 degrees for washing prints would likely be OK.
I was thinking about the Ilford washing technique when I suggested an aquarium heater. He wouldn’t have to carry heated water to the room. He could heat it there.
Cold water will make for a veeeeeerry slow wash. So your concerns are justified.
Put a water cooker in your darkroom, and add some boiling water to a tray of cold water, then put your prints in. It's relatively quick & easy to bring a decently sized tray of water up to 20-24C.
No, it's not. Washing is a diffusion process. It will proceed very slowly at lower temperatures.
If your air temperature is higher, you could consider filling a large container with water ahead of time and then allowing it to come to room temperature before commencing a low flow rate wash.
So the aquarium heater would sit at the bottom or side of the tray for example, and heat the incoming flow of cold water?
Yes but I very much doubt that the wattage of an aquarium heater is enough to raise the temp of constant running cold water to a worthwhile level beyond what it flows in at. Not that that seems to matter based on other posts. It just means that purchase of an aquarium heater may be a waste of money for this purpose and is anyway unnecessary
pentaxuser
Is this what you were suggesting?
Yes but I very much doubt that the wattage of an aquarium heater is enough to raise the temp of constant running cold water to a worthwhile level beyond what it flows in at.
Washing is slower at lower temperatures. It's that simple. Raise temperature, and it'll be faster. To an extent, you can compensate for a lower temperature with a longer wash. Any wash, warm or cold, will have to involve a sufficient replacement of the 'used' wash water - so either continuous flow or changes of water. The latter in practice is fine.
This can easily be calculated. Heating 1g of water by one 1 degree C takes ca. 4.2J. Joules relate to electrical power through the relation 1W = 1J/s. So a 60W aquarium heater will dump around 60J per second into the water it's surrounded with (we can assume a near-100% conversion efficiency). The rest is simple arithmetic and a bit of practical engineering. Without running the number, your concern seems justified.
The aquarium heaters I'm familiar with are not designed to sit in a flow line; they're designed to be lowered into a fish tank.
Has anyone got a formula for working out how much longer/shorter the wash time should theoretically be for each degree difference in temperature?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?