200 colour film then
"First genuinely new colour film since Portra in 1998" has got to be incorrect, right?
A 2-pack for £25.98 at First Call in England
https://www.firstcall-photographic.co.uk/harman-phoenix-c41-colour-film-c-41-135-36-pack-of-2/p13296
Why is it so expensive?
Seems to be partly based on what it is thought that the UK market will pay. brbo's post above (#1508) gives a price of €13.70 at Notdfoto in Germany which converts to around £11.65.
Sounds plausible they're using the existing coating head.
But looking at the current performance of the film, it looks like a single dye-forming layer per color, which makes me wonder if it might be coated in a single pass with a head that can coat up to 6 layers.
This brings the question how they'll handle a more advanced product in the future. Will they opt for the route to sacrifice coating capacity by double coating? Or will they add a head - and the necessary emulsion lines & tanks? I don't know how they've laid out that coating facility - do they have the holding tanks and feed lines running to the coating room so that they can actually use a coater with more layers?
In any case, it sounds to me like they're currently still pushing those decisions ahead of them.
Seems to be partly based on what it is thought that the UK market will pay. brbo's post above (#1508) gives a price of €13.70 at Notdfoto in Germany which converts to around £11.65.
What utter rubbish, why make a third-rate colour neg film?
why make a third-rate colour neg film?
Because it’s a necessary step toward developing a first-rate film. The influencers will likely feel the product is perfect as it is and will be disappointed when it is eventually perfected.What utter rubbish, why make a third-rate colour neg film?
Because it’s a necessary step toward developing a first-rate film. The influencers will likely feel the product is perfect as it is and will be disappointed when it is eventually perfected.
Once the free samples and pre-release mystique are gone, do you really think these influencers are going to spend that kind of money on film with that kind of “character “? And, do you really think that many “serious” photographers are going to “invest” in the future improvement by buying lots and lots of this film?
Once the free samples and pre-release mystique are gone, do you really think these influencers are going to spend that kind of money on film with that kind of “character “? And, do you really think that many “real” photographers are going to “invest” in the future improvement by buying lots and lots of this film?
OK, thanks. Given how muted the colors of unprocessed couplers are, I wonder if it'll really tamper those peaks as much. If you look at fresh emulsion, its color is really very faint. No doubt it does *something* to the color response, but not a whole lot.
@LeoniD you showed this picture and said something about spectral sensitivity. I'm wondering what we're looking at here. It appears to be a spectrum viewed through a piece of (processed?) film. As such, it seems more like a spectral density approximation to me. Am I mistaken?
I think you might not be the target market
Have you seen the purposefully defective films that the Lomo crowd shoots with? This film is excellent compared to them, and pretty much in line with the rest of the Harman branded products!
Do you really want to limit yourself to just another Fuji or Kodak film?
But what I’m poking at is the notion that they can really fund future improvements using the profit from the film sales. I don’t know their profit margin but I’m sure that the R&D funding needs greatly exceeds the profit potential of “beta test” film sales.
Rather than sending the test batch to silver recovery, packaging and selling it will make back considerably more of its costs - and give a useful indicator of where people want the colour rendering to go. I think you are severely underestimating just how expensive some of the components that will need synthesised are (silver is very cheap in comparison).
Once the free samples and pre-release mystique are gone, do you really think these influencers are going to spend that kind of money on film with that kind of “character “? And, do you really think that many “serious” photographers are going to “invest” in the future improvement by buying lots and lots of this film?
I understand that. Brilliant marketing and business decisions. I’m just wondering if it really has long-term potential or if it’s going to fizzle with only short-term results. Some I’m that annoying “glass half empty” skeptic and often I end up being correct.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?