The F2 is without peer in 35mm cameras. And mine is in absolute mint condition. But actually I've been finding myself partial to the 1970 F with complete motor drive and plain finder I recently picked up for a song. This F has a strange charm with that motor drive and battery pack that looks like a jury-rigged factory after thought. Although I have to carry it in my hand to keep the strap rings from worming out the eyelets. Besides, with those eyelets sticking out the ends of the body, even if you used the strap, it would just keep flipping over frontwards. and how 'bout that shutter release on the BACK of the camera, forcing to to curl your finger? A strange bird, bu a legacy work horse for sure. The F2 is refined to a perfection no other camera even came close to.
Nikon F2: Mini Sover Wong Treatment...
-
A
- Thread starter ic-racer
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale Canon FTb w/ 50mm f/1.4 SSC
- Started by Joe Jesus
-
For Sale Nikon F2
- Started by Joe Jesus
-
For Sale FS: Crown Graphic 2x3 Camera, Xenar 105mm f/4.5 Lens, RH10 Roll Film Holder
- Started by B.S.Kumar
-
For Sale FS: Calumet CC402 4x5 Monorail Camera
- Started by B.S.Kumar
-
For Sale FS: Wollensak Verito 8 3/4" f/4 Diffused Focus Lens Copal 3S Shutter
- Started by B.S.Kumar
Forum statistics
To complete my little collection I just got an all black "Apollo" F. I know you know, but for the others, the so-called "Apollo" version was made at the same time the F2 was available and had a plastic tip on the wind lever and the timer lever. Also, stainless reinforced strap lungs (though still in the same cumbersome location). I'll probably start a little thread on that one too.
Last edited:
Another F2 thread on Photrio that should be mentioned:
www.photrio.com
Nikon F2 - DIY Repairs & Maintenance
I eBay purchased an old beat up F2 for less than a carton of beer. It was jammed, the Finder dismantled, shutter crinkled, rusty, dusty, no power to the finder - basically a basket case. So a good project to see if I could get it working again, which I did and successfully. Unable to find much...
www.photrio.com
I have 3 F's and 1 F2 Mint with MD2 and MD3, and plenty of good old non-AI lenses. No more. Besides, Nikon went out of business when they dropped F2 and Nikkormat. Once you've manufactured perfection and it ran its course, there is no way but down.
I just got a 55 1.2 cheap
85mm f1.8 Non-AI for the win.
Another F2 thread on Photrio that should be mentioned:
Nikon F2 - DIY Repairs & Maintenance
I eBay purchased an old beat up F2 for less than a carton of beer. It was jammed, the Finder dismantled, shutter crinkled, rusty, dusty, no power to the finder - basically a basket case. So a good project to see if I could get it working again, which I did and successfully. Unable to find much...
I think this might interest you:
I didn't mean to hijack is excellent thread, but if I may answer that question, it may or may not speak for him. "Where does the patience come from"? 1) You've got to want it. 2) And once started, quitting is not acceptable. Once you've opened it up you're committed and you have to see it through. I'm not sure that's "patience" or not. It's more of a feedback loop you've trapped yourself in, which brings you back to #1. Number 3 is that poor work is unacceptable and excellent work is all that is allowed. Nowhere in that is it expressed or implied that you always know what you're doing, which often means doing it over, as many times as it takes. Patience be damned.
All comments welcome here.
Over Christmas I downloaded as much material on F and F2 I could find. That got me ready to tackle some mechanical Nikon repairs.
Since November last year I have been using on-line auction sites, placing lots of low bids on just about anything NIKON that was 'untested' or obviously in need of repair. Probably 90% of the auctions were lost, but I did get some cameras and equipment. Yes, a lot if it needed work, but there were a few lucky wins. Like the F3 and F.
However, not a single S, S2 or SP, in multiple tries. People are bidding just way too much for those. My maximum bid for those is less then $100 USD.
For example I was a sub $100 bidder on this camera that a couple crazies bit over $4000. But I'm still trying.
Over Christmas I downloaded as much material on F and F2 I could find. That got me ready to tackle some mechanical Nikon repairs.
Since November last year I have been using on-line auction sites, placing lots of low bids on just about anything NIKON that was 'untested' or obviously in need of repair. Probably 90% of the auctions were lost, but I did get some cameras and equipment. Yes, a lot if it needed work, but there were a few lucky wins. Like the F3 and F.
However, not a single S, S2 or SP, in multiple tries. People are bidding just way too much for those. My maximum bid for those is less then $100 USD.
For example I was a sub $100 bidder on this camera that a couple crazies bit over $4000. But I'm still trying.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2016
- Messages
- 186
- Format
- 35mm
IC...you showed the inside with the base plate off. Can you tell me which color wire is the negative wire up to the contact for the meter prism?
Last edited:
I have a black Apollo F with both a plain and FtN prism (that works) as well as an F2 with the original Photomic head. Both a terrific shooters. The F2 clearly is an evolution of the F rather than a different camera like the F3 is (which I also own).
I recently saw and NIB chrome Apollo F offered on FleaBay which was sooooo tempting, but I don't buy cameras to collect them so I passed.
Actually I've always admired the original F1, but never used one. But the original F1 indeed had a brawny beauty about it.. But an internal meter all these years later puts it out of contention. An F or F2 can always have another meter slapped on it. Or a plain prism. A Canon F1 with a dead meter cell is a permanently broken camera. And Canon could never make up their mind on a lens mount for the ages. Every so often a manufacturer makes a product that can never be beaten. Revox with their A77. Nikon with their F2...
We always find ways to explain the unexplainable. None of your points have anything to do how one camera compares to the other.
Olympus 4T had bar far best metering logic of anything ever made in 35 mm world, yet mechanically it feels second class. if only F1 ever had its guts, oh well.
Holding and operating Nikons then the the F1s there is objectively no comparison. They simply feel made by a different class of mechanical engineering.
Did you look inside all of the cameras mentioned to make these statements?
I don’t think I need to, the film advance, how finders and screens fit, how shutter responds is enough to hear and feel the difference of intervals. I never knock down Nikons, they made great cameras. Calling F2 as one without peers is simply indicative how public is swayed by advertising and hear say,
This is my F2 family, including a Nikon F Photomic Tn Apollo.
All of them were at Sover Wong years ago, including the finders and the MD-2 and MD-3 motor drives. They all work like they've been dipped in warm butter
My problem is that I as DIY repairer have nothing to do here and I couldn't service a mechanical camera anyway, especially not to Sover's standard. I'm considering selling everything. But it's a beautiful collection, including the DS-12 aperture control, and it would be a shame to lose it.
Sover's service is second to none, both in terms of performance and processing.
I was almost there firsthand and had a say in what was done. Sover provides a detailed workshop report for every device. You get real value for your money and know exactly what work was done, including the condition the items were in beforehand. As far as I know, the waiting time at Sover is currently several months.
And when I look at the work from @ic-racer from a distance, I recognize the same level
Last edited:
I think if you open up the SLRs and compare the mechanics, you'll see only first-class solutions and material quality. These cameras were built for rigorous, continuous use; no one is better or worse than the other; this is the top league.
No point of gong further. If one cannot feel& hear the difference between mechanics of F1 and F2 then that is end of the road. F2 finders almost feel loose by comparison, screens same thing, film advance is clearly tighter mechanically on the F1, even the back door gives different tactile feedback.
As I said before, Nikons made great cameras, and they clearly lasted as long as anyone would have wished for, subjected to pro rigours just like F1 line up. Canon may have failed some audience with some design solutions, but it is highly debatable whether Canon's approach to in camera metering was a disadvantage to Nikon's finder only. I'd argue otherwise, whether or not 30+ focusing screens were necessary to cover all aspects of photography. It's a moot argument as it does not cover the actual mechanics of these cameras.
If it makes any difference to anyone, Canon and Nikon both made great quality pro level cameras. When one sticks to a brand it's hard to think of the other, especially if it's impossible to be dissatisfied with what Nikon offered. Still I stand behind what I said on the mechanics, different class of precision engineering, perhaps in some areas that were immaterial to a lasting functional quality.
I speak from experience, as I also have the Canon F-1(n) in my collection. It's a robust, solid SLR, and it's no less impressive than the F2. They're in the same league.
As for the viewfinders, neither model is designed for hammering nails.
That the F2 has proven itself in professional use is beyond question. Canon has already taken the market lead with the EF series.
I don't consider anything else objective; it doesn't do justice to the facts.
Last edited:
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |