Finished both a Canon Canonet QL17 and a Minolta HI Matic 7s today. The Minolta was easy. It seemed to work OK but was missing any foam seals. I resealed it...
The canon was a bit more. It was recently given to me and I'd guess that it probably took a pretty good jolt at some point, probably while in a case. No dents anywhere, in fact cosmetically its very clean, but the meter needle wouldn't move freely and I think had been knocked off its pivot. I couldn't get in to the pivot area to fix it so I pulled a meter out of a parts body I have and swapped it in. It works, so I calibrated the meter and went out for a test. I ran a short roll of Delta 100 through both bodies this afternoon and just finished processing. Both look like they are working just fine!
Comparing the two, my first impression is that the Minolta is a more solid piece. It just feels more substantial. I've another Canonet QL17 that I've always enjoyed but this Minolta seems to be a mighty fine camera. I'm curious to compare the scans and see how the respective lenses compare.