Me too, but it's a different scope because it is more of a reintroduction that unfortunately ran into so many hurdles. Kudos to both Harman and Adox for the interest and efforts on film however!I'm way more excited about CHS100 in 120. And I like how Adox did it. Just drop the message. No teasing. And just making use of all the people waiting from another new film from a competitor, in 3 days
+1 on that. And it does not even have to be color. Adox have shared quite a bit on what they have been up to and Silvermax was manufactured with Agfa legacy components that IIRC would be too uneconomical to synthesize now. And Ferrania's halted E6 was also due to the legacy chemicals not being good anymore.The colour rendering/ sensitivity being a bit wayward seems to be where the hints are pointing. If you dig up Ron's Colour System Engineering posts, you can see where the evolutionary steps run. From here, Harman's organic chemists will likely need to start producing more customised components (which gets expensive very very fast) to get it zeroed in. It may well be that Ilford has done this as an experiment to see where the couplers etc that they already make would get a colour film to, and Phoenix is being run up the flagpole to gauge demand before they go full steam ahead on making chemicals that would be needed to solve any weirdnesses.
Then there are issues with how it has been dried after processing.
And any competent scan system (or enlarger) is plenty capable of holding it flat.
I'm unclear on where exactly this potential 'quality differential' (if present) might lie.
Perhaps extended red sensitivity or enhanced for scanning.
Yes. But 99% of scanners fail to scan ColorPlus cleanly, and with proper color and contrast.
The Fuji Frontier series are the only scanners I have seen that do justice to this film, being very clean and smooth, with dead on color accuracy.
The Fuji Frontier series are the only scanners I have seen that do justice to this film, being very clean and smooth, with dead on color accuracy.
I fail to see a meaningful difference in general colour/contrast accuracy between Fortier and Noritsu scans...
Frontier
vs.
Noritsu
Even if you regard Nortisu scans to be failed, Frontier scans are just as bad enough that, if those scans are absolutely true representation of photographed subjects, I don't want to visit places or meet people in those scans.
(full disclosure; I actually generally prefer Frontier scans to Noritsu/Pakon/Agfa lab scans)
Get back to the Phoenix!
Yes. But 99% of scanners fail to scan ColorPlus cleanly, and with proper color and contrast.
This sounds like a reasonable request.
Yes, back to the Phoenix!
... make some Phoenix in bizarre exotic sizes like 120 ... once a year
and make some Phoenix in bizarre exotic sizes like 120
That's irony, the language we speak in England.120 is a bizarre size?
Maybe Harman can be persuaded to join in Ilford's ULF campaign, and make some Phoenix in bizarre exotic sizes like 120 (and quarter-plate?) once a year, if you promise to buy enough of it.
Imagine my gall in wanting them to release Pan 100 in 120?!
Maybe Harman can be persuaded to join in Ilford's ULF campaign
The concern over quality of Harman Phoenix comes about due to the leaked images
It's the same company.
I'm also going by a few things relayed to me that come from the datasheet of the product. It's very clear to me that this is not a film that's meant to compete head on with C41 color film intended for general still photography. At least not in terms of objective quality. I'm sure many people will love it for its quirks. Heck, maybe I even will - I'll gladly give it a spin.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?