This film is produced in Europe. How do you expect it to appear in North America without international shipping?! Do you think the rest of the world somehow gets Kodak film without shipping costs?
There was a thread about cheap colour film. See how many of Europeans complained about shipping costs (shipping for film from OP was about 3x as expensive as from Fotoimpex to USA).
Like i said originally......not available in N America. As a photographer working in BW I'm not going to add international shipping to the already high cost of film. For those in Europe...good that you have it...it's fine film....(for as long as it remains available)
CHS 100 II is often available from Freestyle and I buy it from them at least once a year. CHS 100 (the original) is no longer made, so there's no point in discussing that film. Let's not conflate the two films.
It was not my intention to 'conflate' the films. It just underlines my point that unfortunately Adox films, as good as they are, are not generally available. As you mentioned Freestyle....it is currently out of stock, as it is at B&H.
Last year I was in Europe for August & September...in Italy, Switzerland and France. Although I had a reasonable amount of film, I used a lot. When I was in Paris I went to several well-known photo & camera shops. Kodak and Ilford were on shelves.... Adox was not.
I feel the OP Albireo's pain. Adox has some good products, but if they're not easily available they're not regularly viable films for some of us. So I'm simply stating that is the situation for me.
Well, it's a good thing you weren't hooked on Bergger's Pancro 400!
Adox film is hardly worth talking about in North America. We haven't seen Silvermax or CHS 100 in i don't know how long.
...It is available out of Europe at fotoimpex.com. Shipping is pretty slow and expensive...
Costly but now distinctly not slow. When ADOX products are in stock at Freestyle, the prices are sufficiently higher than FOTOIMPEX's that, if one is seeking enough film which isn't too heavy, things balance out.
Adox has updated the film but you are right, it is definitely a challenge to find it here in the US. Adox will have to be able to keep things stocked here in the US.
I would like to try some but I can't find it here in 35mm. I haven't searched exhaustively but Adox CHS 100 ii in 35mm is pretty hard to find. Not even Amazon has it and they seem to sell everything. Sheet films are available but I would imagine that sheet film isn't in heavy demand.
However CMS 20 ii Pro seems pretty widely available but again, I doubt a lot of people are using a film that slow, particularly one that is advertised as needing a special developer to actually get that ISO 20 rating.
It is available out of Europe at fotoimpex.com. Shipping is pretty slow and expensive but if I do decide to go ahead with this film I may have to go that route. The price from Europe will likely keep me from trying it in 35mm until I can get it here. But, since I do shoot a fair amount of sheet film I'll try a bit and see how it works out.
If their website is up-to-date looks like Argentix has 9 rolls of 35mm/100....
Not sure. They state "non-disponable" which understand to mean "not available" but my French is always very questionable.
Bergger say 'Rupture de stock', which sounds quite nasty.
Not sure. They state "non-disponable" which understand to mean "not available" but my French is always very questionable.
I guessed what it meant, but it still conjures images of an agricultural disaster.
I think Adox deserves credit for bringing out HR-50. We know that it is based on the same Aviphot stock used in Rollei Retro 80 S. The Agfa aerial stocks have the best IR sensitivity of existing stocks. However, because they were not designed for pictorial use, they are tricky and tend to be overcontrasty. In my opinion, Adox's Speed Boost treatment does help to tame the contrast of aerial film. I don't know of other film manufacturers that have gone to the trouble of such a process. HR-50 is better than Retro 80-S in almost every way except that it is only 35 mm. For non-IR photos, HR-50 has a remarkably fine grain, as far as I know, only bested by document films. I don't do reversal processing, but HR-50 is said to work well for that. This is also an opportune moment to contrast how much integrity Adox has compared to MACO. You might say that doesn't take much, but still, I don't take it for granted how much better Adox treats its customers. One could knock Adox by saying they don't coat HR-50, so they don't really make it. Okay, but they modify it to it a more usable product.
In the bigger picture, Adox has also generally been a leader in bringing higher resolution to 35 mm emulsions where it is most needed. These films may not suit everyone's tastes, and some may say it is better to use larger formats. The reality is that the majority of film shooters use 35 mm, and most may never move up to larger formats. It is good that they have the high rez options from Adox.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?