Thoughts on Adox' film offer (as opposed to their chemistry offer)

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
638
Format
35mm
I am glad that CHS 100 II is similar to Silvermax, which I greatly miss. Adox says of CHS 100, "The film is made from two separate emulsions in a single layer coating and yields a very large exposure latitude." My understanding is that modern BW films tend to have multiple layers of different sensitivity that accommodate varying lighting conditions. In my ignorance, I thought that a single emulation layer was a drawback, maybe like some very old-school films. But if CHS 100 has wide latitude maybe that implies it performs like modern films.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,135
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
It's similar to Efke 100 in that regard. I remember when I took two rolls of film to test the developing times, Efke 100 and Agfa APX 100 (the real one), and it was easy to tell the one stop over- and underexposured APX 100 apart from the normal, while the Efke 100 negs had a much smoother transition from neg to neg. Especially it took overexposre very well. Very good film for box cameras with no or limited settings.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,261
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format

How does that work? How can a film deliver gradation/contrast within a neg, but not between negatives that are exposed differently?
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,135
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
How does that work? How can a film deliver gradation/contrast within a neg, but not between negatives that are exposed differently?

They do, but the difference is smaller if the film has greater exposure latitude. I'm no expert, but it should depend a lot on if a film has a mix of emulsions of different speeds and in what proportions.
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
1,973
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
Wasn't CHS 100 based on a 1960s ADOX formulation?

My understanding is that CHS 100 was a rebranding of Efke film (which was a spectacular film and I still mourn its loss).


CHS 100 II is allegedly an attempt to replicate that great Efke perfromance into a more modern emulsion. So far, I am unconvinced, but still working on it..
 
Last edited:

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,864
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format

I think that there are many, many, many of us who still mourn the passing of Efke. Even with equipment and plant failing all around them they still produced amazing film stocks.

Forget modernizing; You wouldn't think it would be that difficult to recreate their film emulsions with today's technology. It still baffles me as to why we are unable to produce those films.
 

Ivo Stunga

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
1,136
Location
Latvia
Format
35mm
A new regulation here, a new classification as toxic material there, economic feasibility and lost knowledge?
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
1,973
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

I bought everything I could get my mits on in 120, 2x3 sheets, and 4x5 sheets. I was late to discovering just how amazing this stuff was. I should have bough 10x as much.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,760
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format

Their spectral sensitivities are quite similar, but with subtle differences, if you are referring to KB 100. Efke KB 100 had a bit more sensitivity to red than CHS, out to about 680nm, whereas CHS stops at about 660. Efke's dip in sensitivity in the yellows is probably what made red/green separation slightly better. Their characteristic curves are more similar, though, same with grain. I wish I had some KB 100 still. I do have some KB 50 sheet film, but it's closer to FP4.
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
1,973
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

Most of what I've shot is PL100M in 2x3 and it's just stupid sharp. It responds well to EMA or Semistand processing in dilute Pyrocat. Example:

 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,760
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Most of what I've shot is PL100M in 2x3 and it's just stupid sharp. It responds well to EMA or Semistand processing in dilute Pyrocat. Example:

View attachment 348686
Yup! I used to semi-stand it in very dilute Pyrocat-HD, and still do with PL 25.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,135
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
I don't want to sound like a besserwisser, but:

KB = Kleinbild (small format, 35mm)
R = Rollfilm (127, 120...)
PL = Planfilm (sheet film)
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
1,973
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
I don't want to sound like a besserwisser, but:

KB = Kleinbild (small format, 35mm)
R = Rollfilm (127, 120...)
PL = Planfilm (sheet film)

That's interesting, but why would a Croatian company resort to a German naming scheme, I wonder, or am I assuming Germanic naming when it's really not ...
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,135
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
That's interesting, but why would a Croatian company resort to a German naming scheme, I wonder, or am I assuming Germanic naming when it's really not ...
They continued using the old Adox names for the films.
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,864
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
I bought everything I could get my mits on in 120, 2x3 sheets, and 4x5 sheets. I was late to discovering just how amazing this stuff was. I should have bough 10x as much.

I agree. I still have a small stock of 35mm, 120 and 4x5 left in the freezer but it is slowly running out. I had hoped at the time that by this time someone would have come out with a replacement. Doesn't look as if it is going to happen. If Adox can't pull it off I don't know anyone who can.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,562
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
why would a Croatian company resort to a German naming scheme

Because German was at one point the 'lingua franca' in European engineering, and even today lingers as a language spoken (at least a little) as a secondary language in many countries in the eastern half of Europe, the Balkans etc. Basically, if you travelled Europe up to around 1990, you were better off with a good command of German than of English.
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,917
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
German was at one point the 'lingua franca' in European engineering

+1

And since I presume you speak German, I can say that Lichtstärke sounds much more familiar to me than lens speed.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,135
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
DuPont had the rights to the formulae and Fotokemika made the films under license. They kept the names KB14, KB17 and KB21 (R14 and so on for Rollfilm and PL for the sheet film). In the 90s they changed the names to KB20, KB40 and KB100, and then later to KB25, KB50 and KB100. The first names with 14, 17 and 21 were the speeds in DIN.

The jump from ASA 20 and 40 to 25 and 50 didn't mean a change in the emulsion. According to the papers the 20, 40 and 100 speeds were for Tungsten lighting, the the speeds in daylight were the double.
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
1,973
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

And was I surprised to figure that out when I first tried PL100M. Most every film I've ever tested on a densitometer, shows an actual usable EI of about 1/2 box ASA speed (except when processed with standing techniques, which is a whole other discussion).

I was therefore interested to measure the PL100M at a usable EI of 100 ... only to discover that it's daylight speed was - as you say - actually rated at ASA 200.


I sooooo will miss this film when I run out of it.
 

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
638
Format
35mm
Sometimes old films cannot be resurrected because the materials are unavailable or prohibited. Panatomic X & cadmium. Adox said that Silvermax used a legacy sensitizer from Agfa that was too expensive to get from new sources. I remember Mirko saying that a film using the same ingredients with a different coating machine is a different film. The coating machine makes that much difference.
 

bluechromis

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
638
Format
35mm

I remember Mirko saying that if you want to support a photo manufacturer, buy paper from them. Paper sales are what keep the factory doors open. I hope Adox will be able to ramp up its paper offerings.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…